PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2008Journal of Applied Physiology25 citations

Mechanical behavior of the quadriceps femoris muscle tendon unit during low-load contractions

View Full Paper
TFTaija FinniMHMarko HavuSSShantanu Sinha

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We examined the relationships between morphology and muscle-tendon dynamics of the quadriceps femoris muscle of 11 men using velocity-encoded phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thigh muscle electromyography and joint range of motion were first measured outside the MRI scanner during knee extension-flexion tasks that were performed at a rate of 40 times/min with elastic bands providing peak resistance of 5.2 kp (SD 0.4) to the extension. The same movement was repeated inside the MRI scanner bore where tissue velocities and muscle morphology were recorded. The average displacement in the proximal and distal halves of the rectus femoris and vastus intermedius aponeuroses was different (P = 0.049), reflecting shortening (1.6%), but the tensile strain along the length of the aponeuroses was uniform. The aponeurosis behavior varied among individuals, and these individual patterns were best explained by the differences in relative cross-sectional area of rectus femoris to vastus muscles (r = 0.71, P = 0.014). During dynamic contraction, considerable deformation of muscles in the axial plane caused an anatomic measure such as muscle thickness to change differently (decrease or increase) in different sites of measurement. For example, when analyzed from the axial images, the vastus lateralis thickness did not change (P = 0.946) in the frontal plane through femur but increased in a 45 degrees oblique plane between the frontal and sagittal planes (P = 0.004). The present observations of the heterogeneity and individual behavior emphasize the fact that single-point measurements do not always reflect the overall behavior of muscle-tendon unit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Finni et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70ab92c1a24a6142db8d99https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01069.2007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Length-force characteristics of the aponeurosis in the passive and active muscle condition and in the isolated condition1994 · 149 citations
  2. 2Real‐time sonography to estimate muscle thickness: Comparison with MRI and CT2001 · 202 citations
  3. 3Should tendon and aponeurosis be considered in series?2005 · 66 citations
  4. 4An Explanation for Various Rectus Femoris Strain Injuries Using Previously Undescribed Muscle Architecture1995 · 214 citations
  5. 5Measurement of skeletal muscle motion in vivo with phase‐contrast MR imaging1994 · 45 citations