PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1994British Journal of Pharmacology97 citationsOpen Access

Potentiation by ACE inhibitors of the dilator response to bradykinin in the coronary microcirculation: interaction at the receptor level

View Full Paper
MHMarkus HeckerIPIlkka PörstiABAgnieszka T. Bara

Key Points

  • To explore how ACE inhibitors affect bradykinin-induced dilation at the receptor level in coronary microcirculation.
  • Isolated saline-perfused rabbit heart model was used for testing effects of bradykinin and ACE inhibitors.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Isolated saline-perfused heart and isolated jugular vein of the rabbit
I
Intervention
Co-infusion of ACE inhibitors (ramiprilat ≥ 10 nM, moexiprilat, quinaprilat) with bradykinin (10 nM) or D-Arg[Hyp3]-bradykinin (10 nM)
C
Comparator
Less potent ACE inhibitor n-octyl-ramipril (RA-octyl), ACE substrates (hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine, angiotensin I), or bradykinin alone
O
Outcome
Changes in coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and prostacyclin (PGI2) releasesurrogate

ACE inhibitors potentiate the dilator response to bradykinin in the rabbit coronary microcirculation likely through interaction with the B2-receptor or its signal transduction pathway rather than by preventing bradykinin degradation.

Abstract

To examine the possibility that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors modulate the action of bradykinin at the receptor level, their effect on the dilator response to bradykinin was studied in the isolated saline-perfused heart of the rabbit. 2. Continuous infusion of bradykinin (10 nM) elicited a transient decrease in coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and increased prostacyclin (PGI2) release which returned to baseline values within 30 min. 3. Subsequent co-infusion of ramiprilat (> or = 10 nM) or moexiprilat, but not of the less potent ACE inhibitor n-octyl-ramipril (RA-octyl), caused another fall in CPP and an increase in PGI2 release, the magnitude and time course of which were almost identical to the first response to bradykinin. No change in CPP or PGI2 release was observed when the ACE inhibitors were administered in the absence of exogenous bradykinin. 4. Infusion of D-ArgHyp3-bradykinin (10 nM), a specific B2-receptor agonist which was significantly more resistant to degradation by ACE than bradykinin, produced virtually identical changes in CPP and PGI2 release when compared to bradykinin. Subsequent co-infusion of ramiprilat was similarly effective in restoring the fall in CPP and increase in PGI2 release elicited by D-ArgHyp3-bradykinin as in the presence of bradykinin. 5. In concentrations which should block the degradation of bradykinin by ACE in the coronary vascular bed, two ACE substrates, hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine (0.2 mM) and angiotensin I (0.3 microM), were unable to elicit a significant change in CPP or PGI2 release while ramiprilat and another ACE inhibitor, quinaprilat, were still active in the presence of these substrates. 6. To reveal the potential B2-receptor action of ramiprilat, its effect on the constrictor response to bradykinin was studied in the rabbit isolated jugular vein. Ramiprilat (0.1 MicroM), but not RA-octyl (1 MicroM),potentiated the endothelium-independent, B2-receptor-mediated constrictor response to bradykinin, but not that to the thromboxane-mimetic U46619 (9,11-dideoxy-ll alpha,9 alpha-epoxymethano-prostaglandin F2.).Moreover, ramiprilat but not RA-octyl caused a concentration-dependent, B2-receptor antagonist sensitive increase in tone when administered alone.7. These findings suggest that an interaction of ACE inhibitors with the B2-receptor or its signal transduction pathway rather than an accumulation of bradykinin within the vascular wall is responsible for the restoration of the endothelial response to bradykinin (dilatation, PGI2 release) in the coronary vascular bed of the rabbit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hecker et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70d73afe4101aa97e056d4https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb14050.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper