PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1992Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis13 citations

An attempt to standardize APTT reagents used to monitor heparin therapy

View Full Paper
MRMichael RayPCP. A. CarrollISIan R. Smith

Key Points

  • The aim is to standardize activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents used in monitoring heparin therapy.
  • Citrated samples from 100 patients on intravenous heparin and 20 normal patients were tested.

Structured PICO

Can APTT results from different reagents be mathematically standardized for monitoring heparin therapy?

P
Population
100 patients on i.v. heparin and 20 normal patients
I
Intervention
Mathematical transformation of APTT ratios using a Heparin Sensitivity Index (HSI)
C
Comparator
Reference APTT reagent batch
O
Outcome
Ability to mathematically relate APTT results between different reagentssurrogate

Mathematical standardization of APTT reagents for heparin monitoring is not feasible due to high inter-reagent variation, highlighting the need for a standard APTT reagent.

Abstract

Citrated samples from 100 patients on i.v. heparin and 20 normal patients were tested with three batches each of three activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents: Thrombosil I (Ortho); Automated APTT (Organon Teknika) and Actin FSL (Baxter). The ratio of APTT over the geometric mean normal APTT for each heparinized sample was calculated. One batch of reagent arbitrarily chosen as a reference gave the ratios APTRREF (y). The remaining reagents to be standardized against the reference system gave the ratios APTRTEST (x). The best correlation between systems was given by log vs log x. Standard curves were prepared from the APTT ratios of the 20 normal patients and 65 of the heparinized samples. On plotting log APTRTEST vs log APTRREF the y intercept was close to zero so x was expressed in terms of y using; log x = HSI. log y, where HSI (Heparin Sensitivity Index) = slope. The APTRTEST results of the remaining 35 heparinized samples were transformed using; APTRTRANS = (APTRTEST)HSI.APTRTRANS was then compared to APTRREF to determine whether the transformation brought the results closer to the reference. We conclude that although some improvement was found by using the transform, it was not possible to mathematically relate APTT results due to a high degree of variation between results using different reagents. A standard APTT reagent for the monitoring of heparin therapy is recommended. A separate APTT reagent may be required for the screening of factor deficiencies and lupus anticoagulants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ray et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70fcf72163a0a01bc52ef6https://doi.org/10.1097/00001721-199212000-00007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper