PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1986Neurology127 citations

Comparison of PET, MRI, and CT with pathology in a proven case of Alzheimer's disease

View Full Paper
PMPatrick L. McGeerHKH. KamoRHR. Harrop

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CT were carried out in a patient with Alzheimer's disease 16 months before he died. At autopsy, the gross appearance of the brain correlated with MRI and CT, which showed some regional atrophy. These were much less revealing than PET, which correlated with microscopic findings of neuronal loss and proliferation of glia. In areas of moderately impaired local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose, as revealed by reduced FDG uptake, there was some gliosis, primarily around the numerous senile plaques. In areas of severe metabolic impairment, there was a profound loss of neurons, extensive gliosis, and a diminished appearance of plaques. PET-FDG is a better measure of the severity of Alzheimer's disease than MRI or CT, because it reflects the degree of neuronal pathology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McGeer et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7101ed5d37378ac1de2cb1https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.36.12.1569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper