PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1997Clinical Chemistry107 citationsOpen Access

Multicenter evaluation of a second-generation assay for cardiac troponin T

View Full Paper
HBH BaumSBSiegmund BraunWGW. Gerhardt

Structured PICO

Does the second-generation cTnT assay improve cardiospecificity compared to the first-generation assay?

P
Population
Patients with ischemic myocardial injury, skeletal muscle damage (multitraumas, surgery, marathon runners), Duchenne disease, and renal failure
I
Intervention
Second-generation assay for cardiac troponin T (cTnT) on the Enzymun system
C
Comparator
First-generation cTnT assay
O
Outcome
Cardiosensitivity and cardiospecificity (interassay precision, false positive rates)surrogate

The second-generation cTnT assay offers improved cardiospecificity over the first-generation assay, eliminating false positives in patients with skeletal muscle damage.

Limitations

  • Cause of increased cTnT in renal failure remains unclear
  • Minor myocardial damage or expression of cardiac isoform in regenerating muscles cannot be ruled out in cases with apparently falsely increased values

Abstract

We report on the evaluation of the second-generation assay for cardiac troponin T (cTnT) on the Enzymun system. This new assay is completely specific for the cardiac isoform of TnT, utilizing two cardiospecific monoclonal antibodies. The assay time is reduced to 45 min. The interassay precision shows a median CV of 5.5%; 20% interassay CV was found between 0.05 and 0.1 microg/L. The cardiosensitivity of the second-generation cTnT assay in patients with ischemic myocardial injury appears equivalent when compared with the first-generation assay. We found no falsely positive results in patients with skeletal muscle damage including multitraumas, surgery patients, and marathon runners who showed highly increased values with the unspecific first-generation assay. In Duchenne disease cTnT was still increased, but to a much lower extent. cTnT remains increased in renal failure, but to a lesser degree than with the first-generation assay. The cause of this increase remains unclear. Although a cross-reactivity of skeletal muscle TnT in the second-generation assay could be excluded by our findings, minor myocardial damage or expression of the cardiac isoform of TnT in regenerating muscles cannot be ruled out in those cases with apparently falsely increased cTnT values. The second-generation cTnT assay is a step forward in the combination of cardiosensitivity and cardiospecificity in biochemical markers for diagnosis of heart disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Baum et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a710ed65d37378ac1de389ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/43.10.1877
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper