PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1995Hypertension84 citations

Modulation of Cardiac Autonomic Control in Humans by Angiotensin II

View Full Paper
JTJohn TownendMAM. Al-AniJWJohn N. West

Structured PICO

Does intravenous Angiotensin II infusion alter autonomic activity and RR interval variability compared to phenylephrine in healthy subjects?

P
Population
8 healthy subjects aged 22 to 34 years
I
Intervention
Intravenous Angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion
C
Comparator
Control infusion of phenylephrine producing equivalent steady-state baroreflex activation and experimental hypertension
O
Outcome
Autonomic activity determined by computer analysis of RR interval variability in the time and frequency domainssurrogate

Intravenous Angiotensin II infusion attenuates vagal modulation and increases sympathetic modulation of heart rate compared to phenylephrine in healthy subjects, providing a mechanistic basis for the autonomic effects of ACE inhibitors.

Abstract

Angiotensin II (Ang II) exerts an inhibitory action on vagal activity in animals and may also facilitate sympathetic activity. The object of this study was to compare autonomic activity resulting from equivalent steady-state baroreflex activation during intravenous Ang II infusion with that resulting from a control infusion of phenylephrine. Eight healthy subjects aged 22 to 34 years were studied in a single-blind, randomized, prospective crossover study. Autonomic activity was determined by computer analysis of RR interval variability in the time and frequency domains. Despite equal experimental hypertension with Ang II and phenylephrine infusion, at peak infusion rates the mean RR interval was significantly shorter with Ang II (983 +/- 179 milliseconds; mean +/- SD) than with phenylephrine (1265 +/- 187 milliseconds, P < .01). The variability of RR intervals was not significantly different, but the variability (median interquartile difference) of RR interval successive differences was significantly lower with Ang II (66 milliseconds) than with phenylephrine (104 milliseconds, P < .02). Power spectral analysis revealed the power of the 0.25-Hz component in normalized units to be significantly smaller during Ang II infusion (20.5 +/- 12.7 U) than during phenylephrine (38.2 +/- 14.7 U, P < .05), whereas the power of the 0.1-Hz component was significantly greater during Ang II infusion (67.8 +/- 17.1 U) than phenylephrine (38.8 +/- 20.3 U, P < .05). Measures of vagal modulation of heart rate were significantly attenuated, and sympathetic modulation appeared to be increased during Ang II infusion compared with control phenylephrine infusions. These observations may underlie reports of increased vagal activity during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Townend et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7138f175498292b70ab2cahttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.25.6.1270
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper