PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 25, 2023Civil War Book Review78 citationsOpen Access

Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

HCHarish ChinnasamiMDMohan Kumar DeyRDRam V. Devireddy

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Immobilization using external or internal splints is a standard and effective procedure to treat minor skeletal fractures. In the case of major skeletal defects caused by extreme trauma, infectious diseases or tumors, the surgical implantation of a bone graft from external sources is required for a complete cure. Practical disadvantages, such as the risk of immune rejection and infection at the implant site, are high in xenografts and allografts. Currently, an autograft from the iliac crest of a patient is considered the "gold standard" method for treating large-scale skeletal defects. However, this method is not an ideal solution due to its limited availability and significant reports of morbidity in the harvest site (30%) as well as the implanted site (5-35%). Tissue-engineered bone grafts aim to create a mechanically strong, biologically viable and degradable bone graft by combining a three-dimensional porous scaffold with osteoblast or progenitor cells. The materials used for such tissue-engineered bone grafts can be broadly divided into ceramic materials (calcium phosphates) and biocompatible/bioactive synthetic polymers. This review summarizes the types of materials used to make scaffolds for cryo-preservable tissue-engineered bone grafts as well as the distinct methods adopted to create the scaffolds, including traditional scaffold fabrication methods (solvent-casting, gas-foaming, electrospinning, thermally induced phase separation) and more recent fabrication methods (fused deposition molding, stereolithography, selective laser sintering, Inkjet 3D printing, laser-assisted bioprinting and 3D bioprinting). This is followed by a short summation of the current osteochondrogenic models along with the required scaffold mechanical properties for in vivo applications. We then present a few results of the effects of freezing and thawing on the structural and mechanical integrity of PLLA scaffolds prepared by the thermally induced phase separation method and conclude this review article by summarizing the current regulatory requirements for tissue-engineered products.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chinnasami et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71499f75498292b70ac5e8https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070759
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Efficacy of Bone Marrow Stromal Cell‐Seeded Knitted PLGA Fiber Scaffold for Achilles Tendon Repair2002 · 83 citations
  2. 2Vascularization in tissue engineering2008 · 1,204 citations
  3. 3Biocompatibility of Advanced Manufactured Titanium Implants—A Review2014 · 738 citations
  4. 4Hydrogel‐filled polylactide porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering2006 · 94 citations
  5. 5Tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (TCP-HA) bone scaffold as potential candidate for the formation of tissue engineered bone.2013 · 65 citations