PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1994AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology41 citations

Differences in outward currents between neonatal and adult rabbit ventricular cells

View Full Paper
JSJosé A. Sánchez‐ChapulaAEAlejandro ElizaldeRNRicardo A. Navarro‐Polanco

Structured PICO

P
Population
Single myocytes from papillary muscle and epicardial tissue of adult and neonatal rabbits
I
Intervention
Electrophysiological characterization of outward currents and response to changes in stimulation frequency (0.1 to 1.0 Hz)
C
Comparator
Adult versus neonatal rabbit ventricular cells
O
Outcome
Action potential duration, outward current densities, and kinetic behavior of the voltage-activated transient outward current (I(to1))surrogate

The faster recovery from inactivation of the transient outward current (I(to1)) in neonatal rabbit ventricular cells likely explains their lack of action potential prolongation at higher stimulation frequencies compared to adult cells.

Abstract

In adult rabbit ventricular preparations, action potential duration is significantly increased when stimulation frequency is increased from 0.1 to 1.0 Hz. In neonatal preparations, a similar change in stimulation frequency produced no significant increase in action potential duration. To identify the ionic basis for this difference, we studied different outward currents in single myocytes from papillary muscle and from epicardial tissue of adult and neonatal rabbits. The densities of the outward currents in neonatal cells were about one-half of the current density in adult cells. The density of the voltage-activated transient outward current (I(to1)) was smaller in cells from papillary muscle than in cells from epicardium in adult and newborn rabbits. We found major differences in the kinetic behavior of I(to1) between adult and neonatal cells: 1) the rate of apparent inactivation was faster in neonatal cells, and 2) the recovery from inactivation was significantly faster in neonatal cells, with a time constant of 113 vs. 1,356 ms. We propose that this marked difference in the recovery from inactivation of I(to1) is the basis for the difference in frequency dependence of action potential duration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sánchez‐Chapula et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a716b1f2163a0a01bc59024https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1994.266.3.h1184
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper