PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2013EuroIntervention54 citationsOpen Access

A randomised study of dabigatran in elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease patients

View Full Paper
PVPascal VranckxFVFreek W.A. VerheugtMMMoniek PM de Maat

Structured PICO

Does pre-procedural dabigatran suppress coagulation activation during elective PCI in stable coronary artery disease patients compared to unfractionated heparin?

P
Population
50 stable patients with coronary artery disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)
I
Intervention
Pre-procedural dabigatran 110 mg twice daily (n=19) or 150 mg twice daily (n=21)
C
Comparator
Standard intraprocedural unfractionated heparin (UFH) (n=10)
O
Outcome
Markers of coagulation activation (prothrombin fragment 1+2 [F1+2] and thrombin-antithrombin [TAT] complexes) during PCI up to 2 hourssurrogate

Pre-procedural dabigatran does not provide sufficient anticoagulation during elective PCI, leading to increased coagulation activation and procedural MI compared to standard unfractionated heparin.

Abstract

AIMS: Patients receiving long-term anticoagulant treatment with dabigatran may need to undergo a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We studied markers of coagulation activation during elective PCI in patients using dabigatran in order to investigate whether coagulation activation upon balloon inflation and stenting is suppressed by dabigatran without additional heparin treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: This phase IIa, exploratory, multicentre, randomised, open-label study included 50 stable patients having an elective PCI. Patients on standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were randomised (2:2:1) to either pre-procedural dabigatran 110 mg BID (n=19) or 150 mg BID (n=21), as compared to standard intraprocedural unfractionated heparin (UFH) (n=10). Following PCI, a significant increase in the levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) in the combined dabigatran group was observed compared to the level just before the start of PCI (159.1 1.4 pmol/l; geometric mean gSD). Levels at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 hrs after the start of PCI ranged from 193.5 (1.4) to 270.6 pmol/l (1.7); (p-value for paired analysis=0.015, 0.022, 0.2342, 0.0379, respectively). Also, thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes were increased significantly in the combined dabigatran group compared to pre-PCI levels (4.2 2.2 ug/l). Levels ranged from 5.2 (2.5) to 8.5 (2.3) (p=0.0497, 0.0343, 0.005 and 0.1628, respectively). In contrast, in the control group of patients treated with UFH, no increase was observed in F1+2 and TAT complexes during PCI. Five out of 40 (12.5%) patients required bail-out anticoagulation in the dabigatran group, of whom four experienced a procedural myocardial infarction (MI), versus one out of 10 in the UFH group, who had a stent thrombosis without MI prior to the study-PCI. One minor access-site bleeding occurred in the dabigatran group. CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran treatment (110 mg or 150 mg BID) may not provide sufficient anticoagulation during PCI. EudraCT. No: 2007-007536-25.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vranckx et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a71783d31a3df824329a60fhttps://doi.org/10.4244/eijv8i9a162
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper