PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1994American Journal of Hypertension36 citations

Modern Strategies to Prevent Coronary Sequelae and Stroke in Hypertensive Patients Differ From the JNC V Consensus Guidelines

View Full Paper
LTLouis TobianHBHans R. BrunnerJCJay N. Cohn

Key Points

  • This report aims to examine the differences in treatment strategies for hypertension compared to established guidelines.
  • Gathered opinions from seven hypertension experts regarding treatment strategies.

Structured PICO

Does individualized antihypertensive therapy compared to JNC V guideline-recommended diuretics and beta-blockers better prevent vascular sequelae in patients with essential hypertension?

P
Population
Patients with essential hypertension
I
Intervention
Individualized antihypertensive drug therapy (drugs other than beta-blockers and diuretics)
C
Comparator
JNC V consensus guidelines (diuretics and beta-blockers as first-line therapy)
O
Outcome
Prevention of major vascular sequelae of hypertension (heart attack, ventricular remodeling, hypertrophy, heart failure, and stroke)

Expert consensus challenges the JNC V guidelines, arguing that first-line therapy for hypertension should be individualized and utilize drugs other than beta-blockers and diuretics to best prevent vascular sequelae.

Abstract

In recent years, government agencies of many countries have established consensus guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of hypertension. Once published, guidelines tend to be perceived as directives by a variety of health care providers. Unfortunately, these guidelines often do not reflect the practices of most hypertension experts. This report summarizes the opinions of seven hypertension experts concerning the impact of "official" guidelines on clinical practice. In addition, the individual therapeutic recommendations of these panel members are summarized. Their different treatment strategies reflect the diversity of first rate treatment plans that aim to reduce the cardiovascular sequelae in individual patients with essential hypertension. Most importantly, not one of these seven treatment strategies followed the "preferred" treatment of the U.S. guidelines, which recommend diuretics and beta-blockers as first-line therapy. The present authors approach the treatment of hypertension as a means to reduce cardiovascular events. Thus, reduction of blood pressure is not the most important therapeutic endpoint. The panel believes that whereas many different drugs can produce effective blood pressure reduction, the modern primary goal of antihypertensive drug therapy is to select a regimen most likely to prolong the quality and duration of life. In real terms, this means that the primary goal of treatment is the prevention of the major vascular sequelae of hypertension (heart attack, ventricular remodeling, hypertrophy, heart failure, and stroke) that shorten useful life. There are a number of effective hypertensive treatments, which can be selected based on individual patient requirements. However, many consensus guidelines do not allow the flexibility required to optimize individual patient treatment. As a result, health care providers should not feel compelled to regard the preferences of "official" guidelines as the best, modern, state-of-the-art therapy for an individual patient. All seven experts who are deeply involved in the daily care of patients preferred drugs other than beta-blockers and diuretics (the Joint National Committee JNC choices) for first-line therapy of hypertension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tobian et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a718705e36a167817e3540fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/7.10.859
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper