PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2000Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology10 citations

Initial Results with Left Ventricular Pacemaker Lead Implantation Using a Preformed “Peel‐Away” Guiding Sheath and “Side‐Wire” Left Ventricular Pacing Lead

View Full Paper
SWStuart WalkerTLTerry LevySRStephen Rex

Structured PICO

Is left ventricular pacemaker lead implantation using a preformed "peel-away" guiding sheath and "side-wire" pacing lead feasible in patients with heart failure?

P
Population
13 patients with heart failure undergoing permanent biventricular pacemaker insertion (3 undergoing upgrade of a preexistent VVIR pacing system after prior His ablation for medically refractory atrial fibrillation, 6 requiring left ventricular lead repositioning after total implantation failure or late displacement, and 4 undergoing new system implantation).
I
Intervention
Left ventricular pacemaker lead implantation using a preformed "peel-away" guiding sheath and "side-wire" left ventricular pacing lead.
O
Outcome
Successful implantation (feasibility)

Device implantation using a preformed sheath and side-wire pacing lead is feasible and achieves a high success rate (92%) for biventricular pacemaker insertion.

Abstract

We report our preliminary experience with the use of preformed "peel-away" guiding sheaths and "side-wire" pacing leads for permanent biventricular pacemaker insertion in 13 patients with heart failure. Three of these patients were undergoing an upgrade of a preexistent VVIR pacing system after prior His ablation for medically refractory atrial fibrillation. Six of the patients had undergone attempted biventricular pacemaker insertion, but required left ventricular lead repositioning after total implantation failure or late displacement of the lead. The remaining patients were undergoing new system implantation. Target vessel cannulation was achieved in all patients. However, in one patient, diaphragmatic pacing throughout the target vessel length prevented successful implantation. All other implants were ultimately successful (92% success rate). We conclude that device implantation using a preformed sheath and side-wire pacing lead is feasible and may offer significant benefits over implantation with currently available technology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Walker et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7188882fdcb5703edb7916https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00885.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Permanent Left Atrial Pacing with a Specifically Designed Coronary Sinus Lead1997 · 44 citations
  2. 2Recurrent Atrial Electrode Displacement Complicating a Single Lead VDD Pacing System1999 · 2 citations
  3. 3Permanent Ventricular Pacing Via the Great Cardiac Vein1994 · 50 citations
  4. 4The use of a 'side-wire' permanent transvenous pacing electrode for left ventricular pacing1999 · 18 citations
  5. 5A Method for Permanent Transvenous Left Ventricular Pacing1998 · 57 citations