PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 15, 2004European Journal of Echocardiography3 citationsOpen Access

Improved stroke volume assessment in the aortic and mitral valves with a new method in subjects without regurgitation

View Full Paper
MSMay SadikBRBengt RundqvistNSNedim Selimović

Structured PICO

Does an elliptic mitral annulus area calculation improve stroke volume assessment compared to standard methods in subjects without regurgitation?

P
Population
20 subjects without valvular regurgitation
I
Intervention
Echocardiographic assessment of stroke volume using a new method to calculate mitral annulus (MA) area (elliptic shape) combined with multiple sample sites
C
Comparator
Left ventricular stroke volume (LV SV) measured using the biplane method and LVOT SV
O
Outcome
Difference between LVOT SV, mitral SV, and LV SVsurrogate

While an elliptic mitral annulus area calculation improves mean stroke volume assessment in groups, wide individual variations necessitate its use alongside other Doppler parameters.

Limitations

  • Wide distribution of differences between valves and LV SV in individual patients

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography combining Doppler and two-dimensional data is recommended for quantitative assessments of valvular regurgitation. We applied a new method to calculate the mitral annulus (MA) area in combination with multiple sample sites. Individuals without regurgitation in whom the valvular and left ventricular stroke volumes (SV) should be identical were investigated in order to evaluate the feasibility in quantitative assessments of valvular regurgitation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty subjects were included. Flow velocity was registered with pulsed Doppler in different positions in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and in the MA. The MA area was assumed to be either circular, using the diameter from a four-chamber projection, or elliptic, using the major diameter from a parasternal short axis and a minor diameter from an apical long axis. Left ventricular (LV) SV was measured from LV volumes using the biplane method. The overall difference between LVOT SV and mitral SV using one centrally located measurement and elliptic MA was 3.2+/-15.6 ml (P=0.38), 0.9+/-15.7 ml between LVOT SV and LV SV (P=0.80) and -2.2+/-15.2 ml between mitral SV and LV SV (P=0.54). The corresponding standard deviation of the differences as a percentage of the mean value was 24%, 25% and 23%. A circular shaped MA overestimated the mitral SV compared with LVOT SV (P=0.009) and LV SV (P=0.004). Increasing the number of sample sites in the LVOT or MA did not further improve the results. CONCLUSION: Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography can be used to quantify regurgitation in groups of patients. In individual patients the wide distribution of differences between valves and LV SV implies that the method should be used in conjunction with other Doppler echocardiographic parameters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sadik et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a718beba7fbea1e4408718dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euje.2004.09.012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper