PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1992Circulation22 citationsOpen Access

Cross-sectional early mitral flow-velocity profiles from color Doppler in patients with mitral valve disease.

View Full Paper
SSStein SamstadOROle RossvollHTHans Torp

Structured PICO

P
Population
20 patients with mitral valve disease (10 with mitral regurgitation and 10 with mitral stenosis)
I
Intervention
Color Doppler ultrasound mapping of cross-sectional early mitral flow-velocity profiles
O
Outcome
Flow-velocity profile skewness and comparison of maximum versus mean velocity and time-velocity integralsurrogate

Early mitral flow-velocity profiles are variably skewed in patients with mitral valve disease, indicating that volume flow calculations based on single sample volume pulsed Doppler must account for this skewness to avoid overestimation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional flow-velocity profiles from early mitral flow in 20 patients (10 with mitral regurgitation and 10 with mitral stenosis) were constructed from the velocity data from each point in sequentially delayed two-dimensional digital Doppler ultrasound maps. METHODS AND RESULTS: The data suggested that the early mitral flow studied in an apical four-chamber view was variably skewed in both patient groups. The maximum flow velocity overestimated the cross-sectional mean velocity at the same time by a factor of 1.12-1.86. The maximum time-velocity integral was 1.13-1.77-fold greater than the cross-sectional mean time-velocity integral. In patients with mitral regurgitation, the cross-sectional flow-velocity profile appeared to be most skewed at the level of the mitral leaflet tips. The level of the mitral annulus appeared to give the most homogenous flow-velocity distribution in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: When calculations of volume flow are based on pulsed Doppler ultrasound recordings with a single sample volume, the possibility of a skewed flow-velocity profile must be taken into account.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Samstad et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7271cfe5469ee92be26a36https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.86.3.748
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper