PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2010Thrombosis and Haemostasis147 citations

Oral direct factor Xa inhibition with edoxaban for thromboprophylaxis after elective total hip replacement

ACAlexander T. CohenBEBengt I. ErikssonDPDavid Puskas

Structured PICO

Does oral edoxaban prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement compared to dalteparin?

P
Population
903 patients undergoing elective total hip replacement
I
Intervention
Oral edoxaban 15, 30, 60 or 90 mg once daily, begun 6-8 hours postoperatively and continued for 7-10 days
C
Comparator
Subcutaneous dalteparin once daily (initial dose 2,500 IU, subsequent doses 5,000 IU), begun 6-8 hours postoperatively and continued for 7-10 days
O
Outcome
Incidence of total VTE (proximal and/or distal DVT by venography or symptomatic, objectively confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism during the treatment period)composite

Oral edoxaban once daily demonstrates a dose-dependent reduction in VTE compared to dalteparin after elective total hip replacement, with a similar bleeding profile.

Abstract

Edoxaban is a new oral direct factor Xa inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of edoxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. A total of 903 patients were randomised to oral edoxaban 15, 30, 60 or 90 mg once daily or subcutaneous dalteparin once daily (initial dose 2,500 IU, subsequent doses 5,000 IU). Both drugs were begun 6-8 hours postoperatively and continued for 7-10 days, when bilateral venography was performed. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of total VTE, which included proximal and/or distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) by venography or symptomatic, objectively confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism during the treatment period. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of the composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. All venograms and bleeding events were reviewed by a central independent adjudication committee blinded as to treatment allocation. Of the 903 patients randomised, 776 were evaluable for the primary efficacy analysis. The incidences of VTE were 28.2%, 21.2%, 15.2%, and 10.6% in patients receiving edoxaban 15, 30, 60 and 90 mg, respectively, compared with 43.8% in the dalteparin group (p<0.005 ). There was a statistically significant (p<0.001) dose-response for efficacy across the edoxaban dose groups for total VTE and for major VTE. The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was low and similar across the groups. Oral edoxaban once daily is effective for preventing VTE after total hip replacement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cohen et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7290dc5d37378ac1df4acbhttps://doi.org/10.1160/th10-02-0142
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Apixaban or Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Knee Replacement2009 · 696 citations
  2. 2Rivaroxaban versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Hip Arthroplasty2008 · 1,439 citations
  3. 3Rivaroxaban versus Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis after Total Knee Arthroplasty2008 · 1,301 citations
  4. 4A randomized evaluation of betrixaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, for prevention of thromboembolic events after total knee replacement (EXPERT)2008 · 161 citations
  5. 5Clinical Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the Novel Factor Xa Inhibitor Edoxaban in Healthy Volunteers2010 · 454 citations