PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2013Dalton Transactions55 citations

Tin(ii) fluoride vs. tin(ii) chloride – a comparison of their coordination chemistry with neutral ligands

View Full Paper
CGChitra GurnaniAHAndrew L. HectorEJEdward Jager

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Reaction of SnF2 in MeOH with the appropriate neutral N- or O-donor ligands produces SnF (2, 2'-bipy) 2SnF6, SnF (1, 10-phen) 2SnF4 and SnF2 (L) L = Me3PO, dmso or pyNO). The X-ray structures of SnF (2, 2'-bipy) 2SnF6, SnF (1, 10-phen) 2SnF4 and SnF2 (dmso), reveal trigonal pyramidal Sn (II) cores with longer fluorine bridges completing distorted 5- or 6-coordination. Attempts to prepare SnF2 adducts with various phosphine or diphosphine ligands in MeCN failed, whilst in CH2Cl2 solution complex reactions involving the solvent occurred. The NHC, 1, 3- (2, 6-di-isopropylphenyl) imidazol-2-ylidene (IDiPP) and SnF2 produced the imidazolium salt, IDiPPHSnF3, the crystal structure of which revealed the first example of a discrete trifluorostannate (II) ion. In contrast, diphosphine complexes of tin (II) chloride formed readily, including SnCl2Me2P (CH2) 2PMe2, SnCl2o-C6H4 (PMe2) 2, SnCl2o-C6H4 (PPh2) 2 and (SnCl2) 2 (μ-Ph2P (CH2) 2PPh2), which were characterised by X-ray crystallography. The structures of SnCl2Me2P (CH2) 2PMe2 and SnCl2o-C6H4 (PMe2) 2 reveal chloride-bridged dimers, but SnCl2o-C6H4 (PPh2) 2, although also dimeric, has very asymmetric diphosphine coordination best described as κ (1). The structures of (SnCl2) 2 (μ-Ph2P (CH2) 2PPh2) and of SnClo-C6H4 (AsMe2) 2SnCl3 reveal trigonal pyramidal cores, but with longer Sn···Cl bridges affording polymeric structures. The synthesis of SnCl2 (R3EO) 2 (R = Ph, E = P or As; and R = Me, E = P) are also reported, along with the structure of SnCl2 (Me3PO) 2, which contains distorted tetragonal pyramidal Sn (II) coordination. X-ray structures are also reported for (PMe3) 2CH2SnCl32 and Ph2P (H) (CH2) 2P (H) Ph2SnCl32, obtained as by-products from the attempts to synthesise phosphine complexes, as well as (o-C6H4 (PMe2) 2CH2I2. All complexes were characterised by microanalysis, IR and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy ( (1) H, (19) F (1) H, (31) P (1) H and, where solubility allowed, (119) Sn). Comparisons are drawn with corresponding Sn (IV) and Ge (II) complexes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gurnani et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72b5f56c240de38cdc71echttps://doi.org/10.1039/c3dt50743b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper