PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1999Journal of Clinical Microbiology80 citationsOpen Access

Improved Detection of Rhinoviruses in Clinical Samples by Using a Newly Developed Nested Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay

AAArno C. AndewegTBTheo M. BestebroerMHMartijn Huybreghs

Structured PICO

Does a newly developed nested RT-PCR assay improve the detection of rhinoviruses in clinical samples from acute respiratory disease patients compared to previous PCR or culture?

P
Population
1,070 acute respiratory disease patients who had consulted their general practitioners, and a dilution series of cultured viruses (39 rhinoviruses).
I
Intervention
Newly developed nested reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay with optimal RNA extraction and amplicon identification with probe hybridization
C
Comparator
Previously used nested RT-PCR assay or virus culture
O
Outcome
Detection rate of rhinovirussurrogate

The newly developed nested RT-PCR assay significantly improves the detection of rhinoviruses in clinical samples compared to older methods, which will aid in determining the disease burden.

Abstract

This paper describes the development and evaluation of a new nested reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for the detection of rhinovirus in clinical samples. The nucleotide sequences of the 5' noncoding regions of 39 rhinoviruses were determined in order to map the most conserved subregions. We designed a set of rhinovirus-specific primers and probes directed to these subregions and developed a new nested RT-PCR. The new assay includes an optimal RNA extraction method and amplicon identification with probe hybridization to discriminate between rhinoviruses and the closely related enteroviruses. It proved to be highly sensitive and specific. When tested on a dilution series of cultured viruses, the new PCR protocol scored positive at 10- to 100-fold-higher dilutions than a previously used nested RT-PCR. When tested on a collection of clinical samples obtained from 1,070 acute respiratory disease patients who had consulted their general practitioners, the new assay demonstrated a rhinovirus in 24% of the specimens, including all culture-positive samples, whereas the previously used PCR assay or virus culture detected a rhinovirus in only 3.5 to 6% of the samples. This new assay should help determine the disease burden associated with rhinovirus infections.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andeweg et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72b6fd87f921057128a646https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.3.524-530.1999
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper