PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2023Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface14 citationsOpen Access

Cardiovascular Response to Intraneural Right Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Adult Minipig

FAFilippo AgnesiCZCiro ZinnoISIvo Strauss

Structured PICO

Does intraneural right vagus nerve stimulation modulate heart rate and blood pressure in adult minipigs?

P
Population
Sexually mature male minipigs
I
Intervention
Intraneural stimulation of the right thoracic vagus nerve using an intraneural electrode with varying contacts and stimulation parameters (amplitude, frequency, and pulse width)
O
Outcome
Heart rate and blood pressure responsesurrogate

Intraneural right vagus nerve stimulation safely and selectively modulates heart rate and blood pressure in a preclinical minipig model.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study explored intraneural stimulation of the right thoracic vagus nerve (VN) in sexually mature male minipigs to modulate safe heart rate and blood pressure response. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We employed an intraneural electrode designed for the VN of pigs to perform VN stimulation (VNS). This was delivered using different numbers of contacts on the electrode and different stimulation parameters (amplitude, frequency, and pulse width), identifying the most suitable stimulation configuration. All the parameter ranges had been selected from a computational cardiovascular system model. RESULTS: Clinically relevant responses were observed when stimulating with low current intensities and relatively low frequencies delivered with a single contact. Selecting a biphasic, charge-balanced square wave for VNS with a current amplitude of 500 μA, frequency of 10 Hz, and pulse width of 200 μs, we obtained heart rate reduction of 7.67 ± 5.19 beats per minute, systolic pressure reduction of 5.75 ± 2.59 mmHg, and diastolic pressure reduction of 3.39 ± 1.44 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Heart rate modulation was obtained without inducing any observable adverse effects, underlining the high selectivity of the intraneural approach.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Agnesi et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72ca956c240de38cdc782fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2023.03.002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Vagus Nerve and Vagus Nerve Stimulation, a Comprehensive Review: Part I2015 · 404 citations
  2. 2Impact of Acute Changes of Left Ventricular Contractility on the Transvalvular Impedance: Validation Study by Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis in Healthy Pigs2013 · 15 citations
  3. 3Celiac Vagus Nerve Stimulation Recapitulates Angiotensin II-Induced Splenic Noradrenergic Activation, Driving Egress of CD8 Effector Cells2020 · 56 citations
  4. 4Comparison of Symptomatic and Functional Responses to Vagus Nerve Stimulation in ANTHEM-HF, INOVATE-HF, and NECTAR-HF2020 · 77 citations
  5. 5Handbook of Cardiac Anatomy, Physiology, and Devices2006 · 163 citations