PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1995European Heart Journal10 citations

The effect of nadolol on heart rate and the standard deviation of the RR intervals

View Full Paper
MPM. V. PTTZALISFMFilippo MastropasquaFMFrancesco Massari

Structured PICO

Does nadolol modify the standard deviation of RR intervals and coefficient of variance in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions?

P
Population
47 patients with symptomatic, frequent (>30h−1) and reproducible premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), including 16 with previous myocardial infarction, 22 with non-ischaemic cardiac diseases, and 9 with no heart disease.
I
Intervention
Nadolol 80 mg/day for 5 days
C
Comparator
Baseline (two 24 h Holter recordings during washout period)
O
Outcome
Standard deviation of RR intervals (SDRR) and coefficient of variance (CV) over 24 hours, daytime, and night-timesurrogate

The effect of nadolol on heart rate variability parameters like SDRR and CV differs based on the presence and type of underlying structural heart disease.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nadolol in modifying the standard deviation of RR intervals (SDRR) and the coefficient of variance (CV) in 47 patients characterized by symptomatic, frequent (>30h−1) and reproducible premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Sixteen patients had suffered a previous myocardial infarction (Group 1), 22 had various non-ischaemic cardiac diseases (Group 2) and nine had no heart disease (Group 3). All patients underwent two 24 h Holter recordings during the washout period, and a third Holter recording was taken 5 days after the administration of nadolol (80 mg. day−1). The RR cycle length (RR), SDRR and CV were evaluated for each 24 h period, as well as for six daytime (1000–1600h) and six night-time hours (0000–0600h). In all three groups, nadolol was highly effective in lengthening RR. However, the effect on SDRR was different in the three group 24-h SDRR tended to be reduced in all three groups (but the reduction was significant only in Group 1) due to a certain RR homogeneity. On the other hand, daytime SDRR tended to increase (but the increase was significant only in Group 3). CV is concomitantly affected by heart rate and SDRR, therefore it may be more sensitive in evaluating the effect of beta-blockers. The reduction in CV post-nadolol means that the bradycardia-induced effect is associated with an inadequate increase, or even a reduction in SDRR, whereas the absence of any CV clianges (found only in Group 3) is the result of a concomitant increase in both RR cycle length and SDRR It can be concluded that: (1) 24-h SDRR is an inadequate index for verifying the effect of beta-blockers on heart rate variability, and that it is preferable to evaluate CV over shorter period (2) the slowing of heart rate is not always associated with an effort on SDRR; (3) the different effects of nadolol on the three groups may depend on the presence or absence of heart disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

PTTZALIS et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72e0edbeb211e5dcf3d15dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060895
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper