PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 5, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology1 citations

Impact of Tumor Genomic Profile on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results From the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Study

View Full Paper
AWAndréa WitzTCThierry ConroyALAurélien Lambert

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the role of tumor genomic profiles in the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
  • Tumor DNA sequencing conducted on 317 tumors from the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial.
  • Analysis of four key PDAC driver genes and 24 homologous recombination repair genes.
  • Assessment of disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) linked to PurIST subtypes.
  • mFFX significantly improved DFS compared with GEM in KRAS-mutated tumors (sHR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79]; P < .001).
  • Classical tumors demonstrated superior DFS compared to basal-like tumors (sHR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.77]).
  • No predictive benefit from HRR or BRCA status (P int. = .568 and P int. = .785).

Abstract

PURPOSE Modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX/mFFX) is the standard adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), offering survival benefits over gemcitabine (GEM). However, the contribution of molecular biomarkers to treatment selection remains unclear. Here, we characterize the molecular landscape of tumors from the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial and assess the clinical impact of genomic alterations and molecular subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Tumor DNA sequencing was successfully performed in 317/350 tumors (168 mFFX; 149 GEM), complemented by transcriptomic subtyping using the PurIST classifier. Mutational status of four key PDAC driver genes and 24 homologous recombination repair (HRR)–associated genes was analyzed, alongside single-base substitution (SBS) mutational signatures. Primary and secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), respectively. RESULTS In the mFFX group, the PurIST subtype was prognostic, with classical tumors showing superior DFS compared with basal-like tumors (stratified hazard ratio sHR, 0.48 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.77). Among KRAS- mutated patients, mFFX significantly improved DFS compared with GEM (sHR, 0.60 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79; P < .001), while no benefit was observed in KRAS wild-type tumors (interaction test, P int. = 0.010). HRR and BRCA status were not predictive ( P int. = .568 and P int. = .785, respectively). The benefit of mFFX was consistent across SBS-positive and SBS-negative subgroups. CONCLUSION Overall, these results do not support a change in current adjuvant treatment strategies. mFFX remains the standard adjuvant regimen in PDAC, and the observed lack of benefit in KRAS wild-type tumors should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrants further investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Witz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72e823226790f370657a8ahttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02508
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper