PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2006European Journal of Heart Failure34 citations

Prognostic Value of Brain Natriuretic Peptide in the Management of Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

View Full Paper
MPMaria Vittoria PitzalisMIMassimo IacovielloFSFrancesca Di Serio

Structured PICO

Does plasma BNP level predict the progression of heart failure in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?

P
Population
n=50 consecutive patients with heart failure (NYHA class III, left bundle branch block, LVEF ≤35%), mean age 61, 23 male. 8 with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. All taking conventional HF therapy and clinically stable, undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
I
Intervention
Plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level evaluation before and 1 month after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
O
Outcome
Progression of heart failure (hospitalization or death after worsening of HF)composite

Elevated BNP levels 1 month after cardiac resynchronization therapy strongly predict heart failure progression, identifying patients who may require additional therapeutic interventions.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in predicting the progression of heart failure (HF) after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: It has been shown that BNP predicts the prognosis and can guide the treatment of HF. METHODS: We studied 50 consecutive patients (61+/-10 years, 23 male) with HF (8 with ischaemic cardiomyopathy), NYHA class III, left bundle branch block, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 91.5 pg/ml had 89% sensitivity, 59% specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of 96% and 33%, respectively, for HF progression after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: HF patients with high BNP values after 1 month of CRT have worse prognosis during follow-up. Therefore, in these patients other therapeutic options should be considered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pitzalis et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72ee747cdbf433fe154afchttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.10.013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Usefulness of Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level at Implant in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Advanced But Stable Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy2009 · 14 citations
  2. 2Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Mildly Symptomatic Heart Failure2013 · 27 citations
  3. 3Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients2006 · 16 citations
  4. 4Usefulness of plasma B type natriuretic peptide as a predictor to identify responders following CRT2016 · 1 citations
  5. 5Brain natriuretic peptide - a reliable parameter for the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting2006 · 2 citations