PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2013Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia11 citationsOpen Access

Aerobic Interval Exercise Training Induces Greater Reduction in Cardiac Workload in the Recovery Period in Rats

JBJuliana Pereira BorgesGMGustavo Santos MassonETEduardo Tibiriçá

Key Result

A single interval exercise session in healthy rats caused greater reductions in cardiac workload (heart rate and rate pressure product) during the recovery period compared with continuous exercise.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=30)

Randomization

randomly assigned

Structured PICO

Does interval exercise reduce cardiac workload during recovery more than continuous exercise in healthy rats?

P
Population
30 healthy male rats evaluated for acute and subacute hemodynamic responses to interval versus continuous exercise.
I
Intervention
Interval exercise (30-minute session consisting of three successive 4-minute periods at 60% of maximal velocity, with 4-minute recovery intervals at 40% of maximal velocity)
C
Comparator
Continuous exercise (30-minute session running continuously at 50% of maximal velocity) and a non-exercising control group
O
Outcome
Acute and subacute hemodynamic responses including heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and rate pressure product (RPP) measured before, during, and after the exercise sessionsurrogate

In a healthy rat model, a single session of interval exercise induces greater reductions in cardiac workload during the recovery period compared to continuous exercise.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aerobic interval exercise training has greater benefits on cardiovascular function as compared with aerobic continuous exercise training. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed at analyzing the effects of both exercise modalities on acute and subacute hemodynamic responses of healthy rats. METHODS: Thirty male rats were randomly assigned into three groups as follows: continuous exercise (CE, n = 10); interval exercise (IE, n = 10); and control (C, n = 10). Both IE and CE groups performed a 30-minute exercise session. The IE group session consisted of three successive 4-minute periods at 60% of maximal velocity (Max Vel), with 4-minute recovery intervals at 40% of Max Vel. The CE group ran continuously at 50% of Max Vel. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure(BP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were measured before, during and after the exercise session. RESULTS: The CE and IE groups showed an increase in systolic BP and RPP during exercise as compared with the baseline values. After the end of exercise, the CE group showed a lower response of systolic BP and RPP as compared with the baseline values, while the IE group showed lower systolic BP and mean BP values. However, only the IE group had a lower response of HR and RPP during recovery. CONCLUSION: In healthy rats, one interval exercise session, as compared with continuous exercise, induced similar hemodynamic responses during exercise. However, during recovery, the interval exercise caused greater reductions in cardiac workload than the continuous exercise.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Borges et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in healthy rats (n=30). Interval exercise vs. Continuous exercise (30 minutes at 50% maximal velocity) and no-exercise control was evaluated on Hemodynamic responses (heart rate, blood pressure, and rate pressure product) before, during, and after exercise. A single interval exercise session in healthy rats caused greater reductions in cardiac workload (heart rate and rate pressure product) during the recovery period compared with continuous exercise.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a730886000d38dc8b31e51dhttps://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20130230
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper