PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2000Pediatric Neurosurgery423 citations

Long-Term Follow-Up Data from the Shunt Design Trial

View Full Paper
JKJohn KestleJDJames M. DrakeRMRuth Milner

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previously reported multicenter randomized trial assessed whether 2 new shunt valve designs would reduce shunt failure rates compared to differential pressure valves. The study did not show a significant difference in the time to first shunt failure. Patients entered the trial between October 1, 1993, and October 31, 1995. The primary results were based on the patients' status as of October 31, 1996 (a minimum follow-up of 1 year). This report describes the late complications based on the patients' most recent follow-up. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-four hydrocephalic children at 12 North American and European centers were randomized to 1 of 3 valves: a standard differential pressure valve; a Delta valve (PS Medical-Medtronic) or a Sigma valve (NMT Cordis). Patients were followed until their first shunt failure. Shunt failure was defined as shunt surgery for obstruction, overdrainage, loculation or infection. If the shunt did not fail, follow-up was continued until August 31, 1999. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven patients had shunt failure. Shunt obstruction occurred in 131, overdrainage in 13, loculated ventricles in 2 and infection in 29. The overall shunt survival was 62% at 1 year, 52% at 2 years, 46% at 3 years, 41% at 4 years. The survival curves for the 3 valves were similar to those from the original trial and did not show a survival advantage for any particular valve. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged follow-up to date does not alter the primary conclusions of the trial: there does not appear to be one valve that is clearly the best for the initial treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kestle et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a73159785ade00e526a5dd1https://doi.org/10.1159/000055960
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Pediatric Shunt Design Trial: Lack of Evidence for Observer Bias1997 · 2 citations
  2. 2Delayed Cerebrospinal-Fluid Shunt Infection in Children1989 · 28 citations
  3. 3The Hospital for Sick Children.1915 · 143 citations
  4. 4Rationale and methodology of the multicenter pediatric cerebrospinal sluid shunt design trial1996 · 82 citations
  5. 5Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Failure: Late Is Different from Early2008 · 69 citations