Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The interpretation of galaxy number counts in terms of cosmological models is fraught with difficulty because of uncertainties in the overall galaxy population (mix of morphological types, luminosity functions, etc. ) and in the observations (loss of low surface brightness images, image blending, etc. ). Many of these can be overcome if we use deep high- resolution imaging of a single class of high surface brightness galaxies, whose evolution is thought to be fairly well understood. This is now possible by selecting elliptical and S0 galaxies using Hubble Space Telescope images from the Medium Deep Survey and other ultradeep Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 images. In the present paper, we examine whether such data can be used to discriminate between open and closed universes, or between conventional cosmological models and those dominated by a cosmological constant. We find, based on the currently available data, that unless elliptical galaxies undergo very strong merging since z ~ 1 (and/or very large errors exist in the morphological classifications), then flat models dominated by a cosmological constant are ruled out. However, both an Einstein-de Sitter (OMEGA₀_ = 1) model with standard passive stellar evolution and an open (OMEGA₀_ = 0. 05) model with no net evolution (i. e. , canceling stellar and dynamical evolution) predict virtually identical elliptical and S0 galaxy counts. Based on these findings and the recent reportings of H₀_ ~ 80 km s^- 1^ Mpc^-1^, we find that the maximum acceptable age of the universe is 13. 3 Gyr, and a value of <= 9 Gyr is favored. A flat (LAMBDA not equal to 0) universe is therefore not a viable solution to the H₀_/globular cluster age problem.
Driver et al. (1996) studied this question.