PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1992The Journal of Infectious Diseases32 citations

Comparison of In Vitro Adherence of Methicillin-Sensitive and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to Human Nasal Epithelial Cells

View Full Paper
TWThomas Ward

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Reported nasal carriage rates of personnel caring for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) range from 1% to 6% in contrast to nasal carriage rates of 45%-65% for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) in health care personnel under nonepidemic conditions. One proposed explanation for these conflicting observations was examined, namely that MSSA and MRSA differ in their ability to adhere to nasal epithelial cells. The adherence of 6 genotypically distinct strains of MSSA and MRSA to nasal epithelial cells from 5 healthy donors was compared using a radioisotope assay system (coefficient of variation, 26%). The effect of pretreating epithelial cells with S. aureus-derived ribitol teichoic acid, a known adhesin of S. aureus for epithelial cells, was also examined. The mean (+/- SE) adherence of MRSA compared with MSSA in 108 assays was 125 +/- 11.9 versus 129 +/- 8.3 viable bacteria per cell (P = .67). Dose-dependent competitive inhibition by ribitol teichoic acid was linear and equivalent for MRSA and MSSA (r, .949, P less than .001). As these in vitro results correlate to adherence in vivo, it would be anticipated that MRSA and MSSA would have an equal likelihood of nasal carriage. A critical review of published epidemiologic studies comparing MRSA and MSSA carriage rates also supports this hypothesis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas Ward (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a737d745946a55bc0fb676ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/166.2.400
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper