PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2003Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics238 citations

Race, Ancestry, and Genes: Implications for Defining Disease Risk

View Full Paper
RKRick A. KittlesKWKenneth M. Weiss

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Geneticists are interested in finding genes associated with disease. Because of widespread health disparities, race is a variable that is often said to be relevant in this context. The idea is that members of a preconceived "race" share common ancestry that may include genetic risk factors. Human variation has been shaped by the long-term processes of population history, and population samples that reflect that history carry statistical information about shared genetic variation or "ancestry." But race is an elusive concept and a term difficult even to define rigorously. Unfortunately, these problems are neither new nor related to recent genetic knowledge. Race is also one of the most politically charged subjects in American life because its associated sociocultural component has notoriously led to categorical treatment that has been misleading and politically misused. There are ways in which the concept of race (whether or not the term is used) can be a legitimate tool in the search for disease-associated genes. But in that context race reflects deeply confounded cultural as well as biological factors, and a careful distinction must be made between race as a statistical risk factor and causal genetic variables.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kittles et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a738810d3d4e530dbfb6a9ahttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110356
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper