PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1999Anesthesiology154 citationsOpen Access

Dependence of Explicit and Implicit Memory on Hypnotic State in Trauma Patients 

GLGitta H. LubkeCKChantal KerssensHPHans Phaf

Key Points

  • To determine whether intraoperative explicit and implicit memory formation declines with increasing depth of hypnotic state in acute trauma patients.
  • Acute trauma patients were played word lists via headphones during surgery while depth of anesthesia indicators, including the bispectral index (BIS), were continuously monitored.
  • Postoperative memory was evaluated using a word stem completion test and separated into explicit and implicit components using the process dissociation procedure to compare two memory models.
  • General memory performance declined as bispectral index values decreased, with significant memory retention persisting at BIS levels between 40 and 60; other hypnotic indicators showed no relationship.
  • Memory modeling favored the individual differences model, demonstrating significant implicit memory performance dependent on hypnotic depth, whereas no reliable explicit memory was observed.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is still unclear whether memory of intraoperative events results entirely from moments of inadequate anesthesia. The current study was designed to determine whether the probability of memory declines with increasing depth of the hypnotic state. METHOD: A list of words was played via headphones during surgery to patients who had suffered acute trauma. Several commonly used indicators of anesthetic effect, including the bispectral index, were recorded during word presentation. First, these indicators served as predictors of the memory performance in a postoperative word stem completion test. Second, general memory performance observed in the first part was separated into explicit and implicit memory using the process dissociation procedure, and then two models of memory were compared: One model assumed that the probability of explicit and implicit memory decreases with increasing depth of hypnotic state (individual differences model), whereas the other assumed equal memory performance for all patients regardless of their level of hypnotic state. RESULTS: General memory performance declined with decreasing bispectral index values. None of the other indicators of hypnotic state were related to general memory performance. Memory was still significant at bispectral index levels between 60 and 40. A comparison of the two models of memory resulted in a better fit of the individual differences model, thus providing evidence of a dependence of explicit and implicit memory on the hypnotic state. Quantification of explicit and implicit memory revealed a significant implicit but no reliable explicit memory performance. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly indicates that memory is related to the depth of hypnosis. The observed memory performance should be interpreted in terms of implicit memory. Auditory information processing occurred at bispectral index levels between 60 and 40.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lubke et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a73b151d3d4e530dbfb7890https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199903000-00007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Assessment of Memory under Total Intravenous Anesthesia2013 · 1 citations
  2. 2Learning during anaesthesia1996 · 41 citations
  3. 3Patients' memories of events during general anaesthesia1997 · 65 citations
  4. 4Implicit and Explicit Memory following Surgical Anesthesia1990 · 118 citations
  5. 5Learning and Memory during General Anesthesia 1997 · 167 citations