PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1995Journal of Cardiac Surgery17 citations

Effects of Edema on Systolic and Diastolic Function In Vivo

View Full Paper
HSHenry M. Spotnitz

Key Points

  • To explore how myocardial edema affects systolic and diastolic functions in different animal models.
  • Utilized a rat model to study diastolic properties and myocardial edema effects.

Structured PICO

How does iatrogenic myocardial edema affect systolic and diastolic function in vivo?

P
Population
Rats, pigs, and human patients studied for myocardial edema
I
Intervention
Iatrogenic myocardial edema (e.g., cardioplegia-induced)
C
Comparator
Control state (no edema)
O
Outcome
Changes in systolic and diastolic properties and left ventricular masssurrogate

Iatrogenic myocardial edema causes transient increases in LV stiffness and depressed contractility that resolve rapidly in animal models.

Abstract

Recent advances in the study of myocardial edema are reviewed. A rat model, developed for the study of diastolic properties, is differentiated from larger mammals by less myocardial water content in the control state, by less cardioplegia-induced edema, and by more rapid evolution of ischemic contracture. The model has proven useful in defining the time course of recovery from iatrogenic edema, which requires less than 15 minutes, and in defining the time course and determinants of changes in compliance during transplant rejection. In pigs, a new experimental model allows study of left ventricular (LV) mass variation and changes in systolic and diastolic properties during resolution of iatrogenic edema. Initial studies indicate that iatrogenic edema and related increases in LV stiffness resolve in less than 45 minutes in pigs, in the absence of substantial ischemic injury. No significant changes in systolic performance were demonstrable statistically, but contractility was depressed immediately after reperfusion, requiring inotropic and mechanical circulatory support. In patients, measured changes in intraoperative LV mass are small and require correction for effects of changes in LV volume to define significance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Henry M. Spotnitz (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a73b33138bf1d836e1afaadhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1995.tb00677.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Time Course of Perfusion-Induced Myocardial Edema Resolution in Rats1994 · 15 citations
  2. 2Influence of coronary perfusion and myocardial edema on pressure-volume diagram of left ventricle1961 · 133 citations
  3. 3Tissue osmolality, cell swelling, and reperfusion in acute regional myocardial ischemia in the isolated porcine heart.1981 · 269 citations
  4. 4Effects of crystalloid, blood, and University of Wisconsin perfusates on weight, water content, and left ventricular compliance in an edema-prone, isolated porcine heart model1992 · 71 citations
  5. 5NHLBI funding policies. Enhancing stability, predictability, and cost control.1994 · 764 citations