PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1994AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology76 citations

Effect of acute edema on left ventricular function and coronary vascular resistance in the isolated rat heart

View Full Paper
ARAndrea RubboliPSPaul A. SobotkaDEDavid E. Euler

Key Points

  • This study investigates how acute myocardial edema affects coronary flow and left ventricular function.
  • Isolated isovolumic rat hearts were perfused with Krebs-Henseleit buffer; sample size was 10 per group.

Structured PICO

Does acute myocardial edema increase coronary vascular resistance and decrease left ventricular performance in isolated rat hearts?

P
Population
Isolated isovolumic rat hearts, n=60 (10 per group across 6 groups)
I
Intervention
Perfusion at constant pressure of 100 or 140 mmHg, or with adenosine added at 60 or 140 mmHg, for 90 minutes to induce acute myocardial edema
C
Comparator
15-minute baseline perfusion group and 90-minute 60-mmHg perfusion group (which did not accumulate water)
O
Outcome
Water content, coronary vascular resistance, and left ventricular performance (developed pressure, peak +dP/dt, end-diastolic pressure)surrogate

In an isolated rat heart model, acute myocardial edema directly increases coronary vascular resistance and impairs systolic performance, while end-diastolic pressure is only affected at higher levels of edema.

Abstract

The impact of acute myocardial edema on coronary flow and left ventricular performance was studied in isolated isovolumic rat hearts. After 15 min of aortic perfusion with Krebs-Henseleit buffer, hearts (10/group) were either removed for determination of water content or perfused for another 90 min. Three groups were perfused at a constant pressure of 60, 100, or 140 mmHg, and two groups were perfused at 60 or 140 mmHg with adenosine added. Compared with the 15-min group, there was a significant increase in water content in all groups except the 60-mmHg group (P < 0.005). There was a direct linear relationship between increases in coronary vascular resistance over time and water content (P < 0.0001). A decrease in developed pressure and peak +dP/dt was observed only in those groups that accumulated water. An inverse linear relationship was found between changes in developed pressure and water content (P = 0.0001). Water content had no effect on end-diastolic pressure below 5 ml/g; above 5 ml/g, a direct linear relationship was evident (P = 0.009). The results suggest that myocardial edema increases vascular resistance and decreases systolic performance. End-diastolic pressure is less influenced by edema than either systolic or coronary vascular function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rubboli et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a73dc54bbad068246a8bebfhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1994.267.3.h1054
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Myocardial edema: Comparison of effects on filling volume and stiffness of the left ventricle in rats and pigs1997 · 19 citations
  2. 2Impact of Acute Myocardial Edema on Left Ventricular Function2006 · 18 citations
  3. 3Time Course of Perfusion-Induced Myocardial Edema Resolution in Rats1994 · 15 citations
  4. 4Effects of Edema on Systolic and Diastolic Function In Vivo1995 · 17 citations
  5. 5Iatrogenic Myocardial Edema: Increased Diastolic Compliance and Time Course of Resolution in Vivo1996 · 37 citations