PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 5, 2016Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology4 citationsOpen Access

The Efficacy and Safety of New Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Clinical Practice

SMSergey Moiseev

Structured PICO

Do new oral anticoagulants improve efficacy and safety compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in real clinical practice?

P
Population
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
I
Intervention
New oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran)
C
Comparator
Warfarin and other indirect anticoagulants
O
Outcome
Efficacy and safety (preventing stroke)hard clinical

Real-world observational data confirms the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, mirroring RCT findings.

Abstract

New oral anticoagulants that inhibit factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoksaban) or thrombin (dabigatran), today are increasingly replacing warfarin and other indirect anticoagulants in preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. They were superior to warfarin for some indicators of efficacy and safety in randomized controlled trials. However, the experience of their study in real clinical practice is limited. The need in prospective, observational studies is dictated by the fact that usual practice differs from the conditions of the randomized clinical trials that may improve the efficiency and safety of the treatment, including the expense of strict criteria for patient selection, regular visits, constant safety monitoring and etc. The results of prospective observational XANTUS study and retrospective cohort studies that shown similar results of treatment with new oral anticoagulants in randomized clinical trials and routine clinical practice are presented in the review.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sergey Moiseev (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a757f1f9fe5b048e4e719c5https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2016-12-2-204-209
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1New oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: impact of study design, double counting and unexpected findings on interpretation of study results and conclusions2014 · 52 citations
  2. 2New anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation2011 · 10 citations
  3. 3Efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in cardioembolic prophylaxis of patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation. More lights than shadows2012 · 3 citations
  4. 4Comparative Efficacy and Safety of New Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation2012 · 149 citations
  5. 5A Practical Approach to the New Oral Anticoagulants Used for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation2016 · 2 citations