PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1987AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology14 citations

Regional ventricular segmental dynamics in normal conscious dogs

View Full Paper
LHLuc HittingerBCBertrand CrozatierJBJean-Pierre Belot

Key Points

  • This research examines segmental behavior of the left ventricle during the cardiac cycle under various loading and inotropic conditions.
  • Analyzed left ventricular segmental behavior in six conscious dogs with ultrasonic crystals, a micromanometer, and an aortic cuff occluder.
  • Measured segmental shortening percentages and compared behaviors during different cardiac phases.
  • Explored relationships between segment behaviors under varying loading states.
  • During isovolumic contraction and relaxation, large variations in segmental behavior were observed, indicating significant regional differences.
  • Segmental shortening in the apical region (34.6 +/- 1.1%) was significantly greater than in the basal region (25.0 +/- 1.2%) with P < 0.005.
  • A linear relationship existed between apical and basal shortening during ejection, unaffected by loading changes (slope of 1.49).

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) subendocardial segmental behavior was analyzed during the whole cardiac cycle for different loading and inotropic conditions in six conscious dogs that were instrumented with ultrasonic crystals in the basal (B) and apical (A) LV regions, a LV micromanometer, and an aortic cuff occluder. There were large variations of A and B segmental behavior during isovolumic contraction and relaxation. In contrast, a linear relationship between A and B was observed during ejection but segmental shortening was larger during control in A than in B, whether it was expressed as a percentage of systolic shortening (34.6 +/- 1.1 and 25.0 +/- 1.2%, respectively; P less than 0.005), or whether segments were normalized for passive resting length. This linear relationship during ejection with a slope of 1.49 was not significantly modified by alterations of loading conditions or inotropic state. The larger A than B shortening, independent of the normalization procedure, is attributed to the regional stress distribution in the LV. The absence of regional and cycle invariance particularly during isovolumic phases prevents the inference of ventricular volume from a limited number of dimensions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hittinger et al. (1987) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a758262c96e4a414b5ffa42https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1987.253.4.h713
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analysis of Ventricular Dimension in the Unanesthetized Dog1965 · 20 citations
  2. 2Regional comparison of midwall segment and area shortening in the canine left ventricle.1986 · 68 citations
  3. 3Regional Contraction patterns of the Left Ventricle during Ventricular Pacing1977 · 12 citations
  4. 4Dyssynchrony of segment shortening in the anterior wall of the feline left ventricle1991 · 1 citations
  5. 5Effects of hemodynamic alterations on wall motion in the canine right ventricle1979 · 47 citations