PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 7, 2026Physica Scripta2 citationsOpen Access

Stoquastic simulations of non-stoquastic superconducting flux circuits

HKHarel Kol-NamerTHTom HalversonLGLalit Gupta

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore nonstoquastic superconducting flux circuits and their implications for quantum Monte Carlo simulations.
  • Developed a simulation for continuous-variable circuit Hamiltonians.
  • Analyzed the relationship between qubit representation and circuit-level nonstoquasticity.
  • Investigated the sign problem within a broad class of flux circuits.
  • Simulations showed that the sign problem can be eliminated at the circuit level.
  • Findings indicated that nonstoquasticity in qubit descriptions does not guarantee nonstoquastic behavior in the actual circuits.
  • Results suggest a necessity for reassessing engineering strategies for nonstoquasticity in quantum annealers.

Abstract

Abstract There is a tremendous interest in fabricating superconducting flux circuits that are nonstoquastic—i.e., have positive off-diagonal matrix elements—in their qubit representation, as these circuits are thought to evade sign-problem-free Quantum Monte Carlo approaches and could play a key role in the demonstration of speedups in quantum annealing protocols. We show, however, that for a broad class of such flux circuits, the sign problem can be eliminated by directly simulating the underlying continuous-variable circuit Hamiltonian. Our approach not only obviates the reduction of flux circuits to their qubit representation, but also produces results that are more directly tied to the experimental degrees of freedom. We discuss the implications of our work, arguing that apparent nonstoquasticity in the effective qubit description does not necessarily imply nonstoquasticity, or a QMC sign problem, at the circuit level. These findings call for a careful reassessment of attempts to engineer nonstoquasticity in superconducting flux-based quantum annealers in pursuit of universality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kol-Namer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a758b54847ab6d26c01ead5https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ae94f8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper