PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1995American Journal of Hypertension102 citations

Efficacy and tolerability of losartan potassium and atenolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension*

View Full Paper
BDBjörn DahlöfSKSusan E. KellerLMLukas Makris

Structured PICO

Does losartan reduce blood pressure as efficaciously as atenolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?

P
Population
202 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, multinational.
I
Intervention
Losartan 50 mg once daily, titrated after 6 weeks to 100 mg once daily if sitting diastolic blood pressure >= 90 mm Hg
C
Comparator
Atenolol 50 mg once daily, titrated after 6 weeks to 100 mg once daily if sitting diastolic blood pressure >= 90 mm Hg
O
Outcome
Trough sitting diastolic blood pressure reductions at weeks 6 and 12surrogate

Losartan is as efficacious as atenolol in reducing blood pressure in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and is well tolerated with fewer adverse event-related withdrawals.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of losartan potassium (losartan) and atenolol in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. This was a multinational, prospective, randomized, 12-week double-blind parallel study with a follow-up of 4 to 10 days posttreatment to assess any adverse effects of abrupt therapy withdrawal. Two hundred two patients were randomized (2:1) to treatment with losartan or atenolol, 50 mg once daily. Patients were titrated after 6 weeks to 100 mg once daily if their blood pressure was uncontrolled (sitting diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg). Trough sitting diastolic blood pressure reductions at weeks 6 and 12 were similar in both the losartan (-9.2 mm Hg and -8.3 mm Hg) and atenolol (-10.8 mm Hg and -10.1 mm Hg) groups and a similar percentage of patients responded to each drug. Both agents were generally well tolerated, although eight patients (two patients taking losartan, and six taking atenolol) were withdrawn because of clinical adverse events (P < or = .05). Reduction in pulse rate from baseline averaged 10 beats/min in the atenolol group with no pulse rate reduction observed in the losartan group (P < .01). No evidence of rebound hypertension was observed in either group. In conclusion, losartan was as efficacious as atenolol in blood pressure reduction, and was at least as well tolerated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dahlöf et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a758c3a1cd7cac2185ffc46https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7061(95)00081-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper