PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2012Diabetic Medicine6 citations

Impaired fasting glucose in combination with silent myocardial ischaemia is associated with poor prognosis in healthy individuals

View Full Paper
TITheodoros IntzilakisMMMette Rauhe MouridsenTAThomas Almdal

Key Result

The combination of impaired fasting glucose and silent myocardial ischaemia was associated with an increased risk of death or myocardial infarction (HR 2.5, P=0.016).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=596)

Structured PICO

Does the combination of impaired fasting glucose and silent myocardial ischaemia increase the risk of myocardial infarction or death in healthy individuals without diabetes?

P
Population
596 healthy individuals without diabetes, aged 55-75 years, followed for 6.3 years.
E
Exposure
Presence of both impaired fasting glucose (fasting plasma glucose 5.6-6.9 mmol/l) and silent myocardial ischaemia (≥ 1 mm ST-interval during ≥ 1 min on 48-h continuous ECG monitoring)
C
Comparator
Subjects with impaired fasting glucose alone, silent myocardial ischaemia alone, or neither
O
Outcome
Composite of myocardial infarction and/or death at 6.3 yearscomposite

The combination of impaired fasting glucose and silent myocardial ischaemia identifies a high-risk subgroup for death or myocardial infarction among healthy middle-aged and older individuals.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 2.5

Absolute Event Rate: 36% vs 10%

p-value: p=0.016

Abstract

AIM: As both impaired fasting glucose and silent myocardial ischaemia are risk factors for cardiovascular disease and death, we hypothesized that these risk factors in combination would identify those subjects at the highest risk of adverse events. METHODS: Healthy individuals without diabetes (n=596, 55-75 years) were examined for silent myocardial infarction (≥ 1 mm ST-interval during ≥ 1 min) by ambulant 48-h continuous electrocardiogram monitoring and impaired fasting glucose (fasting plasma glucose 5.6-6.9 mmol/l). RESULTS: After 6.3 years, 77 subjects met the endpoint of myocardial infarction and/or death. The prevalence of silent myocardial ischaemia at inclusion was 12.3% in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and 11.7% in subjects with normal fasting glucose, P=0.69. Subjects with impaired fasting glucose/silent myocardial ischaemia more often met the endpoint (36%) than subjects with impaired fasting glucose/no silent myocardial ischaemia (15%), subjects with normal fasting glucose/silent myocardial ischaemia (12%), and subjects with normal fasting glucose/no silent myocardial ischaemia (10%), respectively, (P<0.001). In a Cox model including these four study groups of interest, gender, age, smoking habits, blood pressure and total cholesterol, only subjects with impaired fasting glucose/silent myocardial ischaemia exhibited an increased risk of death or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio 2.5, P=0.016). CONCLUSION: The combination of impaired fasting glucose and silent myocardial ischaemia was associated with the poorest prognosis in middle-aged and older subjects without previously known glucose metabolic aberration and heart disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Intzilakis et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Healthy individuals without diabetes (n=596). Impaired fasting glucose and silent myocardial ischaemia vs. Normal fasting glucose and no silent myocardial ischaemia was evaluated on Myocardial infarction and/or death (HR 2.5, p=0.016). The combination of impaired fasting glucose and silent myocardial ischaemia was associated with an increased risk of death or myocardial infarction (HR 2.5, P=0.016).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a75c3ccd17bc701ee161ed9https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03639.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper