PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2001Journal of Thoracic Imaging130 citations

Imaging of Aortic Aneurysms and Dissection: CT and MRI

View Full Paper
GHGeorge G. HartnellBaystate Medical Center

Structured PICO

What are the roles of CT, MRI, and echocardiography in the diagnosis of aortic aneurysms and dissection?

P
Population
Patients with aortic aneurysms and aortic dissection
I
Intervention
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
C
Comparator
Echocardiography
O
Outcome
Diagnosis of aortic disease

MRI is the preferred imaging modality for chronic aortic disease, while CT is the most useful for acute aortic presentations.

Abstract

There are numerous approaches to the diagnosis of aortic aneurysms and aortic dissection. Echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enthusiastic proponents promoting each technique, which to some extent obscures the real value of each technique. This review examines the role of these techniques in the diagnosis of aortic disease, with special reference to the most recent published literature and an emphasis on the use of CT and MRI. For most patients with chronic aortic disease, MRI is the most appropriate investigation. In acute situations, CT scanning is usually the most useful technique, with echocardiography added for those with ascending aortic disease or cardiac complications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

George G. Hartnell (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a75cb0e12165deef3dd9b93https://doi.org/10.1097/00005382-200101000-00006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper