PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2001Journal of Applied Physiology59 citations

Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension by MR phase-mapping method

ÉLÉric LaffonFLFrançois LaurentVBVirginie Bernard

Structured PICO

Does MR phase-mapping accurately estimate mean pulmonary artery pressure compared to right heart catheterization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?

P
Population
15 patients assessed for pulmonary arterial hypertension
I
Intervention
Magnetic resonance (MR) phase mapping in the main pulmonary artery (MPA) to measure blood flow and vessel cross-sectional area
C
Comparator
Right-side heart catheterization (invasive measurement of MPA pressures)
O
Outcome
Correlation between MR-derived pressure wave velocity metrics and invasively measured mean pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa)surrogate

MR phase-mapping provides a reliable noninvasive method to estimate mean pulmonary artery pressure, correlating strongly with invasive right heart catheterization.

Abstract

We describe a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging method that emphasizes pressure wave velocity to noninvasively assess pulmonary arterial hypertension. Both the blood flow and the corresponding vessel cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured by MR phase mapping in the main pulmonary artery (MPA) in 15 patients. MPA pressures were also measured, in the same patients, by right-side heart catheterization. Two significant relationships were established: 1) between the pressure wave velocity in the MPA and the mean pressure in the MPA (Ppa) writing pressure wave velocity = 9.25 Ppa - 202.51 (r = 0.82) and 2) between the ratio of pressure wave velocity to the systolic blood velocity peak in the MPA (R) and the mean pressure in the MPA writing R = 0.68 Ppa - 4.33 (r = 0.89). Using these relationships, we estimated two pressure values to frame the actual Ppa value in each patient from the present series with a reasonable reliability percentage (87%).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Laffon et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7608818802f13c0e613911https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001.90.6.2197
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper