PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1979Circulation134 citations

Routine primary repair vs two-stage repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

View Full Paper
JKJohn W. KirklinEBEugene H. BlackstoneAPAlbert D. Pacifico

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Fifteen of 194 patients (7.7%) with tetralogy of Fallot operated upon since January 1, 1972 under a protocol of routine primary repair despite young age died in-hospital. Most deaths were from low cardiac output. Young age and smallness of size increased the risk of operation. No deaths occurred among patients older than 4 years. High hematocrit was also a risk factor. Transannular patching has an independent effect in increasing risk. The post-repair ratio of peak pressure in the right ventricle to that in the left did not exert an independent effect. To project current risks of a two-stage approach, we determined that five of 158 patients (3.2%) died in-hospital after secondary intracardiac repair after a previous Blalock-Taussig or Waterston anastomosis between 1967--1978. Using these data and those we have published on the risk of shunting, we project that except in very small babies, the risks of hospital death of a two-stage approach are not less than those of primary repair done without a transannular patch, except when body surface area is less than about 0.35 m2. When a transannular patch is used in the primary repair, the two-stage approach is projected to be safer when the child has a body surface area of about 0.48 m2 or smaller.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kirklin et al. (1979) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a766d2a98f24dbf64bd2df7https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.60.2.373
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper