PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 1990BMJ60 citationsOpen Access

Management of acute coronary occlusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: experience of complications in a hospital without on site facilities for cardiac surgery.

SRS G RichardsonPMP MortonJMJ G Murtagh

Structured PICO

Can percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty be safely performed in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgical cover?

P
Population
512 patients undergoing 540 coronary angioplasties for stable angina, unstable rest angina, or suitable coronary disease after myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) performed in a hospital without on-site cardiac surgical cover
C
Comparator
Delay times at a nearby hospital with on-site surgical cover (Royal Victoria Hospital)
O
Outcome
In-hospital mortality after complicated coronary angioplasty and delay to surgical revascularisation after acute coronary occlusion at angioplastysafety

Coronary angioplasty can be safely performed in centers without on-site cardiac surgery provided a surgical center is nearby, as transfer times did not significantly increase the delay to urgent revascularization.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty may be safely performed in cardiology centres in the United Kingdom without immediate on site cardiac surgical cover for complications arising at angioplasty. DESIGN: Retrospective review of coronary angioplasties and complications in a hospital without on site cardiac surgical cover. SETTING: All angioplasties were performed in the catheterisation laboratory of the Belfast City Hospital. Revascularisation surgery for complicated coronary angioplasty was performed in the cardiac surgical unit of the Royal Victoria Hospital, 2.4 km away from the catheterisation laboratory. PATIENTS: 540 Coronary angioplasties were performed on 512 patients between late 1982 and November 1988. Indications included stable angina, unstable rest angina, and suitable coronary disease at coronary arteriography after myocardial infarction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In hospital mortality after complicated coronary angioplasty and delay to surgical revascularisation after acute coronary occlusion at angioplasty. RESULTS: Coronary angioplasty was successful in 444 cases (82%). Acute coronary occlusion occurred in 35 cases (6.5%). Twelve patients required urgent revascularisation surgery and were transferred safely to the surgical unit; none of these patients died. A mean delay of 268 minutes (range 180-390 minutes) occurred before revascularisation compared with 273 minutes (range 108-420 minutes) in the Royal Victoria Hospital, where on site surgical cover was available. The principal cause of delay was the wait for a cardiac operating theatre to become available and not the transfer time between hospitals. Five deaths occurred after coronary angioplasty, a mortality of 0.9%. Three deaths were related to acute coronary occlusion. The absence of immediate surgical help did not influence the outcome in any patient. CONCLUSION: With careful selection of patients coronary angioplasty may be safely performed in a hospital without on site cardiac surgical facilities, provided that these are available at a nearby centre.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Richardson et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7699b7ec1fdabb7369a49bhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.300.6721.355
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper