PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2007Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume241 citations

Insufficient duration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement when compared with the time course of thromboembolic events

View Full Paper
DWDavid WarwickRFRichard J. FriedmanGAGiancarlo Agnelli

Structured PICO

Does the duration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis align with the time course of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement?

P
Population
14,965 patients (6,639 THR and 8,326 TKR) with elective primary total hip or knee replacement enrolled in the multi-national Global Orthopaedic Registry.
I
Intervention
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
O
Outcome
Incidence and time course of venous thromboembolism and duration of prophylaxis within three months of surgeryhard clinical

A significant proportion of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement develop VTE after hospital discharge, yet many receive prophylaxis for shorter durations than recommended.

Abstract

Patients who have undergone total hip or knee replacement (THR and TKR, respectively) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism. We aimed to determine the time courses of both the incidence of venous thromboembolism and effective prophylaxis. Patients with elective primary THR and TKR were enrolled in the multi-national Global Orthopaedic Registry. Data on the incidence of venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis were collected from 6639 THR and 8326 TKR patients. The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism within three months of surgery was 1.7% in the THR and 2.3% in the TKR patients. The mean times to venous thromboembolism were 21.5 days (sd 22.5) for THR, and 9.7 days (sd 14.1) for TKR. It occurred after the median time to discharge in 75% of the THR and 57% of the TKA patients who developed venous thromboembolism. Of those who received recommended forms of prophylaxis, approximately one-quarter (26% of THR and 27% of TKR patients) were not receiving it seven days after surgery, the minimum duration recommended at the time of the study. The risk of venous thromboembolism extends beyond the usual period of hospitalisation, while the duration of prophylaxis is often shorter than this. Practices should be re-assessed to ensure that patients receive appropriate durations of prophylaxis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Warwick et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a769cde8a9c0995eb060f7fhttps://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.89b6.18844
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper