PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 11, 2022Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine22 citationsOpen Access

A novel blood pressure monitoring technique by smart HUAWEI WATCH: A validation study according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018 guidelines

LWLili WangHXHong XianJGJiajun Guo

Structured PICO

Does the HUAWEI WATCH accurately measure blood pressure compared to a mercury sphygmomanometer in adult participants?

P
Population
85 participants, mean age 48 ± 18 years (range: 21-85), 62.4% male.
I
Intervention
Blood pressure measurement using the HUAWEI WATCH (three test-watch measurements).
C
Comparator
Four reference blood pressure measurements taken simultaneously by two independent observers using a mercury sphygmomanometer.
O
Outcome
Accuracy of blood pressure measurement (mean BP difference and standard deviation for SBP and DBP) according to ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018 guidelines.surrogate

The HUAWEI WATCH demonstrated excellent consistency with reference mercury sphygmomanometer measurements, fulfilling ANSI/AAMI/ISO guidelines for blood pressure monitoring.

Abstract

Background: Given the rapid innovation of wearable technology, additional physical indicators can be detected, and blood pressure (BP) has become the focus of many emerging medical-device manufacturers. This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the newly developed HUAWEI WATCH in BP monitoring, according to the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018) guidelines. Materials and methods: The same arm sequential BP measurement was applied. One validation included four reference BP measurements taken simultaneously by two independent observers using a mercury sphygmomanometer, alternating with three test-watch measurements. Each test-watch measurement was compared against the average of the previous and subsequent reference BP readings. Two criteria were required for validation: (1) a mean BP difference of 5 mm Hg or less, with a standard deviation (SD) of 8 mm Hg or less for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in the 255 pairs of measurements, and (2) an SD for the of 85 averaged BP differences within the threshold defined by the mean test-reference BP difference listed in the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018 guidelines. Results: The mean age of the 85 participants was 48 ± 18 years (range: 21-85), and 53 (62.4%) were male. The mean differences between the test and reference BPs were -0.25 ± 5.62 mm Hg and -1.33 ± 6.81 mm Hg for SBP and DBP, respectively (according to Criterion 1). The mean differences between the test BPs and reference BPs were -0.25 ± 5.00 mm Hg and -1.33 ± 6.31 mm Hg for SBP and DBP, respectively, according to Criterion 2. Conclusion: Blood pressure measurement using the HUAWEI WATCH showed excellent consistency with reference BPs, and fulfilled both validation criteria of the guidelines, show its promise as a wearable device for BP self-monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a76ed50576efb0ddaf6f0afhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.923655
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper