PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2016Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance28 citationsOpen Access

Experimental validation of contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR for quantification of myocardium at risk in acute myocardial infarction

DNDavid NordlundMKMikael KanskiRJRobert Jablonowski

Key Result

Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR accurately quantified myocardium at risk compared to myocardial perfusion SPECT in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (bias 1 ± 3% LVM, r2=0.92).

Structured PICO

Does contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR accurately quantify myocardium at risk compared to MPS in an experimental porcine model of acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
12 pigs subjected to experimental acute myocardial infarction to validate contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR for quantification of myocardium at risk.
I
Intervention
Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed in-vivo and ex-vivo after intravenous gadolinium-based contrast injection.
C
Comparator
Myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) using a technetium-based perfusion tracer as a reference standard.
O
Outcome
Myocardium at risk (MaR) expressed as % of left ventricular mass (LVM) and its stability over the first 30 minutes after contrast injection.surrogate

Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR accurately quantifies myocardium at risk in an experimental AMI model and remains stable for 30 minutes, validating its use for assessing myocardial salvage.

Main Result

Mean Difference: 1

Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 30%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • When comparing MaR-size over time, single midventricular slices, and not full LV coverage, were acquired.
  • Data over time after contrast-injection could not be acquired at all timepoints for all animals due to technical and medical reasons.
  • Manual delineation was used to assess MaR.
  • Single midventricular slices, and not full LV coverage, were acquired when comparing MaR-size over time
  • Data over time after contrast-injection could not be acquired at all timepoints for all animals due to technical and medical reasons
  • Manual delineation was used to assess MaR

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of myocardium at risk (MaR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is necessary when assessing myocardial salvage. Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) is a recently developed cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) method for assessment of MaR up to 1 week after AMI. Our aim was to validate CE-SSFP for determination of MaR in an experimental porcine model using myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) as a reference standard and to test the stability of MaR-quantification over time after injecting gadolinium-based contrast. METHODS: Eleven pigs were subjected to either 35 or 40 min occlusion of the left anterior descending artery followed by six hours of reperfusion. A technetium-based perfusion tracer was administered intravenously ten minutes before reperfusion. In-vivo and ex-vivo CE-SSFP CMR was performed followed by ex-vivo MPS imaging. MaR was expressed as % of left ventricular mass (LVM). RESULTS: = 0.87, p < 0.001. No change in MaR was seen over the first 30 min after contrast injection (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR can be used to measure MaR, both in vivo and ex vivo, in a porcine model with good accuracy and precision over the first 30 min after contrast injection. This offers the option to use the less complex ex-vivo imaging when determining myocardial salvage in experimental studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nordlund et al. (2016) studied Acute myocardial infarction (n=12). Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR vs. Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) was evaluated on Agreement between myocardium at risk (MaR) by ex-vivo CE-SSFP and MaR by MPS (bias 1 ± 3% LVM, p=<0.001). Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR accurately quantified myocardium at risk compared to myocardial perfusion SPECT in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (bias 1 ± 3% LVM, r2=0.92).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a76fa03d3a6aa87c6bd7ffdhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0325-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper