PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1985Radiology160 citations

Aortic dissection: magnetic resonance imaging.

View Full Paper
EAEG AmparoCHC B HigginsHHHedvig Hricak

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing aortic dissection.
  • Fifteen patients with suspected aortic dissection underwent MRI evaluation.

Structured PICO

Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately diagnose and characterize aortic dissection in patients with suspected or known disease?

P
Population
15 patients with suspected or known aortic dissection (13 eventually shown to have dissection, 3 with Marfan syndrome).
I
Intervention
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
C
Comparator
Aortography and/or computed tomography (CT) (used as reference standard in most cases).
O
Outcome
Diagnostic capability of MR for aortic dissection (demonstrating intimal flap, determining type A or B, differentiating true/false lumens).surrogate

Early experience suggests MRI is a capable, non-invasive initial imaging modality for diagnosing and characterizing aortic dissection without the need for iodinated contrast.

Abstract

Fifteen patients with suspected or known aortic dissection were imaged with magnetic resonance (MR). Thirteen of these patients were eventually shown to have dissection. In most instances the diagnosis was established by aortography and/or computed tomography (CT) prior to the MR study. Surgical proof (6/13) and/or aortographic proof (10/13) were available in 11/13 patients with aortic dissection. MR demonstrated the intimal flap and determined whether the dissection was type A or type B. In addition, MR: differentiated between the true and false lumens; determined the origins of the celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries from the true or false lumen in the cases where the dissection extended into the abdominal aorta (8/12); allowed post-surgical surveillance of the dissection; and identified aortoannular ectasia in the three patients who had Marfan syndrome. In addition to the 13 cases with dissection, there were two cases in whom the diagnosis of dissection was excluded by MR. Our early experience suggests that MR can serve as the initial imaging test in clinically suspected cases of aortic dissection and that the information provided by MR is sufficient to manage many cases. Additionally, MR obviates the use of iodinated contrast media.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Amparo et al. (1985) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a76fa2bdf493903fd1e9276https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.155.2.3983390
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Thoracic aortic dissections: magnetic resonance imaging.1985 · 100 citations
  2. 2Aortic dissection: sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging.1988 · 135 citations
  3. 3Radiologic evaluation of aortic dissection.1991 · 75 citations
  4. 4MR imaging of the aorta after surgery for aortic dissection1988 · 62 citations
  5. 5Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of Aortic Dissection: A Pictorial Essay2007 · 33 citations