PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1992Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology12 citations

A Comparison of Carvedilol with Atenolol in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension

View Full Paper
PYPhilip Young

Structured PICO

Does carvedilol improve blood pressure control compared to atenolol in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension?

P
Population
99 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (47 randomized to carvedilol, median age 59 years; 52 randomized to atenolol, median age 57 years).
I
Intervention
Carvedilol 25 to 50 mg oral once daily (initial dose 12.5 mg for the first 2 days, then 25 mg once daily, with option to double to 50 mg at week 4 if response was inadequate) for 8 weeks.
C
Comparator
Atenolol 50 to 100 mg oral once daily (initial dose 50 mg once daily, with option to double to 100 mg at week 4 if response was inadequate) for 8 weeks.
O
Outcome
Sitting diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg or decreased by greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg at week 8.surrogate

Carvedilol and atenolol demonstrated similar efficacy and safety in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension over an 8-week period.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of carvedilol, a beta-blocker with vasodilating properties, were compared at a dosage of 25 to 50 mg once daily with those of atenolol at a dosage of 50-100 mg once daily in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study. After a single-blind placebo phase of 3 to 6 weeks, 47 patients (median age, 59 years) were randomized to receive carvedilol and 52 patients (median age, 57 years) were randomized to receive atenolol for an 8-week study period. Patients on carvedilol received 12.5 mg for the first 2 days and then 25 mg as a once-daily dosage. The initial dosage of atenolol was 50 mg once daily. The dosage of each treatment could be doubled (to 50 and 100 mg once daily, respectively) at week 4 if the response was inadequate. Sitting and standing blood pressures and heart rates were recorded 24 h after the dose at weeks 4 and 8. Data from 90 of 98 patients who completed the study were eligible for per-protocol analysis. Approximately one-third of the patients in each group required upward dose titration at week 4 because of inadequate response. At week 8, 84% patients receiving carvedilol and 91% receiving atenolol had sitting diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg or decreased their blood pressure by greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg (95% confidence intervals for difference between carvedilol and atenolol, +7% and -21%). Safety profiles were similar between treatments. One patient withdrew; a skin rash developed during the fourth week of treatment with atenolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Philip Young (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7771bcdf493903fd1eef31https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-199219001-00016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper