PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2004American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy89 citationsOpen Access

Effect of warfarin nonadherence on control of the International Normalized Ratio

View Full Paper
AWAmy D. WatermanPMPaul E. MilliganLBLaura Bayer

Key Points

  • To identify the frequency and causes of aberrant INRs in warfarin recipients, focusing on nonadherence.
  • Review of medical records of patients monitored by an anticoagulation service.

Structured PICO

What is the frequency and cause of aberrant INRs in patients receiving warfarin therapy?

P
Population
347 patients whose warfarin therapy was monitored by a telephone-based anticoagulation service in a Midwestern urban hospital between March 2000 and March 2001
I
Intervention
Warfarin therapy (assessment of nonadherence)
O
Outcome
Frequency and causes of aberrant INRs (lower than 1.8 or higher than 3.4) and percentage explainable by warfarin nonadherencesurrogate

Warfarin nonadherence is the leading explainable cause of out-of-range INRs, highlighting the need for targeted adherence interventions in younger (<65) and older (>80) patients.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The frequency and causes of ab- errant International Normalized Ratios (INRs) in warfarin recipients and the percentage explainable by warfarin nonadherence were studied. METHODS: The medical records of patients whose warfarin therapy was monitored by a telephone-based anticoagulation service in a Midwestern urban hospital between March 2000 and March 2001 were reviewed for causes of out-of-range INRs, the percentage of out-of-range INRs attributable to warfarin nonadherence, and demographic and clinical variables predictive of nonadherence. RESULTS: Data from 347 patients were studied. The cohort yielded 4305 INRs, of which 1002 (23%) were out of range (lower than 1.8 or higher than 3.4). Thirty-six percent of the out-of-range INRs were due to warfarin or dietary nonadherence, 9% were due to medical systems problems (including drug interactions), 18% were due to a change in clinical status, and 38% were idiopathic. Age younger than 65 years, age greater than 80 years, and living closer to the laboratory were predictive of warfarin nonadherence. CONCLUSION: Warfarin nonadherence was the most common cause of explainable aberrant INRs in patients taking warfarin. Age younger than 65 years, age greater than 80 years, and living close to the laboratory were predictive of warfarin nonadherence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Waterman et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7777bf98f24dbf64bd874chttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/61.12.1258
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper