PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2001Journal of Range Management48 citationsOpen Access

Intermountain Plant Community Classification Using Landsat TM and SPOT HRV Data

PCPatrick E. ClarkMSM. S. SeyfriedBHBob Harris

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Rangeland plant communities of the Intermountain West differ in their ecology and management requirements. Successful management of extensive areas at plant community-level resolution first requires an efficient, cost-effective means of plant community classification and mapping. We evaluated the influence of image acquisition date and satellite imaging system on the accuracy of plant community maps created from multispectral satellite imagery of Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed (RCEW) (234 km2) in southwestern Idaho. Maps delineating 6 native and 2 non-native Intermountain plant communities were created from Landsat 5 TM and SPOT 3 HRV data using a maximum likelihood classification procedure. Map accuracy was assessed using ground reference points. Maps created from satellite data acquired during dry-down (early August) had higher overall accuracy (average = 70.5%) than from data acquired during peak growth (early June) (average = 54.4%). Overall accuracy of maps generated by Landsat (average = 60.1%) and SPOT (average = 65.5%) were statistically similar. Given their broad spatial coverages (3,600 to 31,450 km2 scene(-1), respectively), moderate resolutions (20 to 30 m pixels, respectively), and potential to provide high classification accuracies, the SPOT 3 HRV and Landsat 5 TM satellite systems were well-suited for classifying plant communities in the Reynolds Creek Watershed and similar areas of the Intermountain West. Practical procedures for plant community classification and map accuracy assessment are presented for use by natural resource managers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Clark et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a779feda7498e5110aeb4d6https://doi.org/10.2307/4003176
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Remote sensing and image interpretation1979 · 4,482 citations
  2. 2Rangeland cover types of the United States.1994 · 92 citations
  3. 3Remote Sensing Technology for Rangeland Management Applications1989 · 150 citations
  4. 4Radiometric processing of aerial and satellite remote-sensing imagery1996 · 2 citations
  5. 5Remote sensing: The quantitative approach1978 · 1,263 citations