PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 7, 2020Scientific Reports37 citationsOpen Access

Atherogenic index of plasma and coronary artery calcification progression beyond traditional risk factors according to baseline coronary artery calcium score

KWKi‐Bum WonDHDonghee HanJLJi Hyun Lee

Structured PICO

Does the atherogenic index of plasma predict coronary artery calcification progression in asymptomatic adults?

P
Population
12,326 asymptomatic Korean adults who underwent at least two coronary artery calcium (CAC) evaluations from December 2012 to August 2016
I
Intervention
Higher atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) quartiles
C
Comparator
Lower atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) quartiles
O
Outcome
Coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression (defined as a difference ≥ 2.5 between the square roots of the baseline and follow-up CACSs)surrogate

The atherogenic index of plasma is a useful predictor of coronary artery calcification progression in asymptomatic adults with a baseline CAC score ≤ 100.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), which has been suggested as a novel marker for atherosclerosis, and coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression according to the baseline coronary artery calcium score (CACS). We included 12,326 asymptomatic Korean adults who underwent at least two CAC evaluations from December 2012 to August 2016. Participants were stratified into four groups according to AIP quartiles, which were determined by the log of (triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). Baseline CACSs were divided into three groups: 0, 1 - 100, and > 100. CAC progression was defined as a difference ≥ 2.5 between the square roots (√) of the baseline and follow-up CACSs (Δ√transformed CACS). Annualized Δ√transformed CACS was defined as Δ√transformed CACS divided by the inter-scan period. During a mean 3.3-year follow-up period, the overall incidence of CAC progression was 30.6%. The incidences of CAC progression and annualized Δ√transformed CACS were markedly elevated with increasing AIP quartile in participants with baseline CACSs of 0 and 1 - 100, but not in those with a baseline CACS > 100. The AIP level was associated with the annualized Δ√transformed CACS in participants with baseline CACSs of 0 (β = 0.016; P 100 (β = 0.032; P = 0.385). After adjusting for traditional risk factors, the AIP was significantly associated with CAC progression in those with baseline CACS ≤ 100. The AIP has value for predicting CAC progression in asymptomatic adults without heavy baseline CAC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Won et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a77ea6a6789de8d0af78387https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78350-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper