PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1997Journal of Experimental Biology9 citations

The Effects of Adrenaline on the Work- and Power-Generating Capacity of Rat Papillary Muscle In Vitro

View Full Paper
JLJoanne LaylandIYIain S. YoungJAJohn D. Altringham

Structured PICO

Does adrenaline improve work and power output in rat papillary muscle in vitro?

P
Population
Rat papillary muscle in vitro
I
Intervention
Adrenaline (concentration producing maximum inotropic effect)
C
Comparator
Control conditions (without adrenaline)
O
Outcome
Maximum work and maximum power outputsurrogate

Adrenaline significantly increases the maximum work and power output of rat papillary muscle in vitro, demonstrating the utility of the work loop technique for assessing pharmacological interventions on cardiac contractility.

Abstract

The work loop technique was used to examine the effects of adrenaline on the mechanics of cardiac muscle contraction in vitro. The length for maximum active force (Lmax) and net work production (Lopt) for rat papillary muscles was determined under control conditions (without adrenaline). The concentration of adrenaline producing the maximum inotropic effect was determined. This concentration was used in the remainder of the experiments. Sinusoidal strain cycles about Lopt were performed over a physiologically relevant range of cycle frequencies (4-11 Hz). Maximum work and the frequency for maximum work increased from 1.91 J kg-1 at 3 Hz in controls to 2.97 J kg-1 at 6 Hz with adrenaline. Similarly, maximum power output and the frequency for maximum power output (fopt) increased from 8.62 W kg-1 at 6 Hz in controls to 19.95 W kg-1 at 8 Hz with adrenaline. We suggest that the power-frequency relationship, derived using the work loop technique, represents a useful index with which to assess the effects of pharmacological interventions on cardiac muscle contractility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Layland et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7919cbc284d7a4ba5ae503https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200.3.503
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper