PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1998Journal of Applied Physiology175 citations

Effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibition on cutaneous vasodilation during body heating in humans

View Full Paper
SSShubha ShastryNDNiki M. DietzJHJohn R. Halliwill

Key Points

  • To determine the role of nitric oxide in neurally mediated cutaneous vasodilation in nonacral human skin during whole-body heat stress.
  • Studied 6 subjects heated with a water-perfused suit while continuously monitoring bilateral forearm cutaneous blood flow using laser-Doppler flowmeters.

Structured PICO

Does nitric oxide synthase inhibition with L-NMMA reduce cutaneous vasodilation during body heating in humans?

P
Population
6 human subjects
I
Intervention
NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) administered selectively to one forearm via brachial artery catheter after cutaneous vasodilation established by body heating
C
Comparator
Contralateral control arm (no L-NMMA)
O
Outcome
Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) measured by laser-Doppler flowmeterssurrogate

Nitric oxide contributes modestly but inconsistently to cutaneous vasodilation during body heating in humans, indicating it is not the sole factor responsible for dilation.

Abstract

We sought to examine further the potential role of nitric oxide (NO) in the neurally mediated cutaneous vasodilation in nonacral skin during body heating in humans. Six subjects were heated with a water-perfused suit while cutaneous blood flow was measured by using laser-Doppler flowmeters placed on both forearms. The NO synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) was given selectively to one forearm via a brachial artery catheter after marked cutaneous vasodilation had been established. During body heating, oral temperature increased by 1.1 +/- 0.1 degreesC while heart rate increased by 30 +/- 6 beats/min. Mean arterial pressure stayed constant at 84 +/- 2 mmHg. In the experimental forearm, cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC; laser-Doppler) decreased to 86 +/- 5% of the peak response to heating (P < 0.05 vs. pre-L-NMMA values) after L-NMMA infusion. In some subjects, L-NMMA caused CVC to fall by approximately 30%; in others, it had little impact on the cutaneous circulation. CVC in the control arm showed a similar increase with heating, then stayed constant while L-NMMA was given to the contralateral side. These results demonstrate that NO contributes modestly, but not consistently, to cutaneous vasodilation during body heating in humans. They also indicate that NO is not the only factor responsible for the dilation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shastry et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7972fd14b028facf0dc745https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.3.830
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper