PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1965Journal of General Microbiology233 citations

The Classification of Staphylococci and Micrococci from World-wide Sources

View Full Paper
ABA. C. Baird‐Parker

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A study has been made of 607 cultures of Gram-positive and catalase-positive cocci received from workers and collections in different parts of the world. These cultures were examined for a wide range of morphological and physiological characters and representative cultures were further studied to determine the chemical constituents of the organisms. Five hundred and sixty-four of the cultures received were aerobic members of the Micrococcaceae, and of these 96% were classified in the author's groups and subgroups; a further subgroup was, however, introduced to accommodate the not previously studied pink-pigmented micrococci. It appears that the Gram-positive and catalase-positive cocci are best separated into the genus Staphylococcus and the genus Micrococcus on the ability of members of Staphylococcus to grow and produce acid from glucose anaerobically; six subgroups of staphylococci were recognized and eight of micrococci. The relationship of named species, groups and subgroups to the author's classification was examined; several species and groups of micrococci had been incorrectly classified. Thus, M. denitrificans, M. halodenitri-ficans and M. radiodurans possess characters which suggest that they should be reclassified with the Gram-negative genera and that Abd-El-Malek and Gibson's group IIIB should be classified with the Gram-positive microbacteria.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A. C. Baird‐Parker (1965) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a797874e357fbdac5890dd4https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-38-3-363
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper