PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Diophantine Equation 2ᵖ - p = kᵐ: Closed Exponent Classes, a Uniform Exponent Bound, and Effective Finiteness

View Full Paper
FNFrederic Nobbe

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze the Diophantine equation 2^p − p = k^m for primes p and integers k, m, focusing on known solutions and boundedness.
  • Conducted an exhaustive computation for p ≤ 10^6 to identify solutions.
  • Utilized Beukers' bounds and Bugeaud-Győry effective bounds to determine solution limitations.
  • Employs a mod-8 filter and the Bauer-Bennett theorem for specific cases.
  • Identified only two solutions: (5,3,3) and (7,11,2).
  • Every solution with p ≥ 10 satisfies m < 52,414.
  • Conjectured that no third solution exists, supported by effective bounds.

Abstract

We study the equation 2ᵖ − p = kᵐ in primes p and integers k, m ≥ 2. Exactly two solutions are known, (p, k, m) = (5, 3, 3) and (7, 11, 2), and an exhaustive computation reported here shows there are no others with p ≤ 10⁶. Results. (A) The only solution with m even is (7, 11, 2) ; the proof combines Beukers' explicit bounds for the generalized Ramanujan–Nagell equation x² − D = 2ⁿ with a mod-8 filter and is checkable by hand (p ≤ 27). (B) The only solution with 3 | m is (5, 3, 3), via Bauer–Bennett's theorem on Ramanujan–Nagell cubics (p ≤ 11). (C) Every solution with p ≥ 10 satisfies m < 52, 414 uniformly in p: we repair a gap in an earlier derivation from the Laurent–Mignotte–Nesterenko two-logarithm bounds, whose parameter estimate had silently restricted the range to p ≤ 1. 17×10⁹. (D) Combining (A) – (C) with effective bounds for Thue equations (Bugeaud–Győry 1996), the equation has only finitely many solutions, all effectively bounded. The effective bound is astronomically large, so the conjecture that no third solution exists remains open. Contents. The deposit contains the research note (PDF + LaTeX source), a README, and a reproducibility package: all verification scripts (Python 3, standard library only, exact integer arithmetic), the itemized proof-status ledger, detailed write-ups with citation caveats and falsifiability notes, and computation logs for the exhaustive search up to p = 10⁶. Transparency / AI disclosure. The mathematical content was developed and adversarially cross-verified with substantial assistance from an AI system (Claude, Anthropic), directed and reviewed by the author, and has not yet been reviewed by a human expert. Section 9 of the note records precisely which cited results were read at their published source and which were verified only via secondary literature. The material is published so that anyone who wishes to verify, correct, or extend it has everything needed to do so.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Frederic Nobbe (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a797d579c20a9bbd3184abfhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21852137
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1On the Diophantine equation $4(7^x)-p^y=z^2$2025
  2. 2Solutions to Diophantine Equations Involving Primes and Perfect Squares2025
  3. 3A Formal Proof of the Non-Existence of Odd Perfect Numbers for Euler Primes p ≥ 5 via Structural Divisibility Constraints2026
  4. 4On the Diophantine Equation $p^x + (p + 5k)^y = z^2$2025
  5. 5An Explicit Eventual p4-Divisibility Theorem for an Apéry-Type Numerator Family2026