PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1985Anaesthesia100 citationsOpen Access

Mental function and morbidity after acute hip surgery during spinal and general anaesthesia

View Full Paper
DBD. BiglerBAB. AdelhøjOPO. U. Petring

Structured PICO

Does spinal analgesia compared to general anaesthesia improve mental function and morbidity in elderly patients undergoing acute hip surgery?

P
Population
40 elderly patients (mean age 78.9 years) undergoing acute surgery for hip fracture
I
Intervention
Spinal analgesia with bupivacaine 0.75%
C
Comparator
General anaesthesia with diazepam, fentanyl and N2O/O2
O
Outcome
Mental function assessed with an abbreviated mental test at 1 week and 3 months postoperativelypatient reported

Spinal and general anaesthesia result in similar mental function outcomes and morbidity in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, though spinal anaesthesia may allow for faster ambulation.

Abstract

Forty elderly patients (mean age 78.9 years) undergoing acute surgery for hip fracture were given at random either spinal analgesia with bupivacaine 0.75% or general anaesthesia with diazepam, fentanly and N2O/O2. Mental function was studied pre-operatively with an abbreviated mental test and 1 week and 3 months postoperatively in both groups. Mortality and number of complications was similar in the two groups, but a shorter time of ambulation was seen in the spinal group compared to the general anaesthetic group. No persistent impairment in mental function was found after acute hip surgery under spinal or general anaesthesia and the only advantage of regional technique was a shorter time of ambulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bigler et al. (1985) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7988238d250a4360f39b3fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10949.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper